California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2213

Introduced
2/7/24  
Introduced
2/7/24  
Refer
2/26/24  
Refer
2/26/24  
Report Pass
4/1/24  
Report Pass
4/1/24  
Refer
4/2/24  
Refer
4/2/24  
Report Pass
4/11/24  
Report Pass
4/11/24  
Refer
4/11/24  
Refer
4/11/24  
Report Pass
4/24/24  
Report Pass
4/24/24  
Engrossed
5/2/24  
Engrossed
5/2/24  
Refer
5/2/24  
Refer
5/2/24  
Refer
5/15/24  
Refer
5/15/24  
Report Pass
5/29/24  
Report Pass
5/29/24  
Refer
5/29/24  
Enrolled
6/13/24  
Enrolled
6/13/24  
Chaptered
7/2/24  
Chaptered
7/2/24  
Passed
7/2/24  

Caption

Redevelopment: oversight boards.

Impact

This legislation impacts local governance by mandating oversight boards to follow realigned supervisory district boundaries, promoting a more context-sensitive approach to local governance. This amendment recognizes the changes in local demographics and needs, ensuring that agencies can operate under appropriate oversight as conditions evolve. Furthermore, the bill introduces a reimbursement protocol, mandating that the state compensate local agencies for associated costs if deemed necessary by the Commission on State Mandates.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2213, introduced by Blanca Rubio, amends Section 34179 of the Health and Safety Code regarding the governance of oversight boards that manage the affairs of dissolved redevelopment agencies in California. The bill requires that oversight boards' jurisdictions align with the boundaries established by the Citizens Redistricting Commission, rather than fixed borders as previously mandated. A key change is the requirement for counties to reassess and determine jurisdiction alignments by specified deadlines, aimed at ensuring oversight is adapted to evolving county district boundaries.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment towards AB 2213 appears to be favorable among proponents who argue that these jurisdiction adjustments will enhance the effectiveness of oversight boards. Supporters view the measure as a positive step towards local accountability and flexibility, ultimately fostering better governance in redevelopment efforts. There is a belief that aligning oversight with current district layouts will prevent administrative logjams and ensure more responsive governance mechanisms.

Contention

Although the bill has gained broad support, there are concerns regarding its implementation, particularly around the potential increased costs for local governments during the transition phase. Some critics argue that the necessity for counties to frequently reassess jurisdiction may lead to confusion or disputes over oversight authority. Additionally, there may be apprehensions about ensuring adequate resources are allocated for local agencies to meet new mandates without compromising their existing capabilities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB3009

Redevelopment: successor agencies: administrative cost allowance.

CA AB1543

Affordable Housing and Community Development Funding Act.

CA AB1270

Redevelopment: successor agency: City of Lake Forest.

CA AB979

Local agency formation commissions: district representation.

CA SB593

Redevelopment: successor agency debt: City and County of San Francisco.

CA SB532

Redevelopment: City of Glendale: bond proceeds: affordable housing.

CA AB411

Redevelopment: City of Santa Cruz: bond proceeds: affordable housing.