California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2269

Introduced
2/8/24  
Introduced
2/8/24  
Refer
2/26/24  
Report Pass
4/2/24  
Report Pass
4/2/24  
Refer
4/2/24  
Refer
4/2/24  
Report Pass
4/17/24  
Engrossed
4/25/24  
Engrossed
4/25/24  
Refer
4/25/24  
Refer
4/25/24  

Caption

Board membership qualifications: public members.

Impact

This proposed change is significant as it is intended to enhance the integrity and impartiality of board members by ensuring that they are not closely tied to the very professionals they are meant to oversee. Should this bill be enacted, it would also establish that these new qualifications would apply to any public or lay member appointed or reappointed on or after January 1, 2025, which provides a clear timeline for implementation and encourages boards to reassess their membership structures accordingly.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2269, introduced by Assembly Member Flora, seeks to amend Section 450 of the Business and Professions Code, which regulates the qualifications for public and lay members appointed to boards within California's Department of Consumer Affairs. The primary aim of the bill is to tighten the eligibility criteria for individuals who can serve on these boards by reducing the time frame in which a potential public member or lay member must have distanced themselves from any relationship with a licensee of that board from five years to three years prior to their appointment.

Conclusion

Overall, AB 2269 represents an effort to reform the governance structure of professional licensing boards in California, aiming to bolster trust in these oversight bodies. If passed, it may lead to notable alterations in how boards function, which could have broader implications for various regulated professions and vocations statewide.

Contention

Discussion around AB 2269 may hinge on concerns regarding how these changes might affect the pool of candidates eligible to serve on boards. While proponents argue that this increased distance will help avoid conflicts of interest, critics may contend that it could limit the diversity of experience and expertise within board membership. The change in eligibility requirements may also provoke debate about the interpretative flexibility of what constitutes a 'relationship' with a licensee and whether this definition might unintentionally exclude qualified candidates.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2936

Supervision of Trustees and Fundraisers for Charitable Purposes Act: donor-advised funds.

CA AB2574

Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment programs and facilities: disclosures.

CA AB1712

Donor-advised funds.

CA SB43

Behavioral health.

CA AB1355

Employment: benefits: electronic notice and documents.

CA AB536

Developmental services.

CA SB283

Developmental services.

CA SB443

Emergency medical services (EMS): prehospital EMS.