California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2318

Introduced
2/12/24  
Introduced
2/12/24  
Refer
2/26/24  
Report Pass
3/19/24  
Refer
3/19/24  
Refer
4/10/24  
Refer
4/10/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Engrossed
5/21/24  
Engrossed
5/21/24  
Refer
5/22/24  
Refer
5/29/24  
Refer
5/29/24  
Report Pass
7/3/24  
Report Pass
7/3/24  
Refer
7/3/24  
Refer
7/3/24  
Enrolled
8/27/24  
Enrolled
8/27/24  
Chaptered
9/29/24  
Chaptered
9/29/24  
Passed
9/29/24  

Caption

State Water Pollution Cleanup and Abatement Account: receipts and expenditures: report.

Impact

The enactment of AB 2318 will result in more rigorous oversight of the State Water Pollution Cleanup and Abatement Account by establishing a structured reporting mechanism. This is expected to promote responsible financial management and improved allocation of resources towards addressing water pollution in California. By detailing how funds are requested, approved, and allocated for various projects, stakeholders will have a clearer view of the effectiveness of state efforts to mitigate environmental impacts associated with water pollution.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2318, introduced by Assemblymember Papan, addresses the State Water Pollution Cleanup and Abatement Account by mandating annual reporting on the receipts and expenditures associated with this account. The bill seeks to enhance transparency and accountability in how funds are utilized for water pollution remediation and related projects. By requiring the State Water Resources Control Board to publish detailed reports on a dedicated website, the bill aims to ensure that stakeholders and the general public can easily access information on financial flows related to water cleanup efforts.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2318 appears to be generally positive, particularly among environmental advocates who view the bill as a step forward in promoting transparency within governmental financial practices. Lawmakers and organizations focused on environmental sustainability have indicated that heightened reporting requirements can foster greater public trust in how environmental funds are managed. However, there may be some concerns from entities that rely on these funds fearing that stringent reporting could involve bureaucratic delays or hinder timely assistance.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding AB 2318 rest on the potential implications for project funding timelines and the administrative burden it may place on the State Water Resources Control Board. Critics may argue that while transparency is crucial, the additional reporting requirements could divert resources from actual cleanup efforts towards administrative compliance. The balance between ensuring accountability and maintaining efficiency in funding processes is likely to be a focal topic in ongoing discussions about the implementation of this legislation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB319

Criminal justice statistics: reporting.

MT HB395

Generally revise voting laws related to individuals of unsound mind

CA SB343

Health care data disclosure.

CA AB2242

Mental health services.

CT HB05279

An Act Concerning Public Institutions Of Higher Education.

CA AB1052

The Financial Information System for California (FISCal).

CA AB1340

Mental health services.

CA AB62

State government: FI$Cal: transparency.