California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2332

Introduced
2/12/24  
Introduced
2/12/24  
Refer
3/21/24  
Refer
3/21/24  
Report Pass
3/21/24  
Refer
4/1/24  
Refer
4/1/24  
Report Pass
4/17/24  
Report Pass
4/17/24  
Refer
4/17/24  
Refer
4/17/24  
Refer
5/1/24  

Caption

Corrections: health care.

Impact

The legislation is poised to significantly impact state law by enforcing standards for the training and credentialing of healthcare providers within the correctional system. Specifically, the bill mandates enhanced training programs for physicians, which include both didactic and practical components aimed at addressing the complex needs of inmates. Moreover, it introduces a working group consisting of medical representatives to ensure the ongoing refinement of integrated treatment strategies, setting a foundation for more effective healthcare delivery in prisons.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2332, introduced by Assembly Member Connolly, focuses on enhancing healthcare within California's correctional facilities, especially regarding substance use disorders. The bill mandates that the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) implement uniform treatment protocols and hire specialized addiction medicine physicians for focusing solely on medication-assisted treatment. This initiative aims to improve existing services for inmates suffering from substance abuse issues, which has increasingly become a critical facet of inmate health in the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2332 appears largely supportive among health care professionals and advocates for inmate rights, as it emphasizes the importance of specialized care for populations at risk of substance dependency. However, there may also be underlying tensions regarding its implications on departmental budgets and resource allocation, which could elicit concern from various stakeholders about the capacity to implement such changes effectively amidst existing challenges.

Contention

Some notable contentions may revolve around the necessity and feasibility of recruitment for specialized addiction medicine physicians, particularly in a landscape where correctional health services already experience funding and staffing challenges. Critics may argue that while the intent is commendable, the execution of such a program could potentially strain resources further. Additionally, there is a broader debate on whether focusing solely on treatment within the correctional system adequately addresses the rehabilitative needs of inmates or if more comprehensive approaches are required.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB554

Nurse practitioners: physician assistants: buprenorphine.

CA AB395

Substance use treatment providers.

CA AB2384

Medication-assisted treatment.

HI SB708

Relating To Prescriptive Authority For Clinical Psychologists.

CO HB1045

Treatment for Substance Use Disorders

CA AB2115

Controlled substances: clinics.

IN HB1462

Health matters.

TX HB3285

Relating to programs and initiatives to prevent and respond to opioid addiction, misuse, abuse, and overdose and identify and treat co-occurring substance use disorders and mental illness.