California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB237

Introduced
1/13/23  
Refer
1/26/23  
Introduced
1/13/23  
Report Pass
3/23/23  
Refer
1/26/23  
Refer
3/28/23  
Report Pass
3/23/23  
Refer
4/26/23  
Refer
3/28/23  
Failed
2/1/24  
Refer
4/26/23  

Caption

Intradistrict and interdistrict transfers: low-performing pupils.

Impact

If enacted, AB 237 will have significant implications for state education laws by strengthening the rights of low-performing pupils to transfer to schools that may better meet their educational needs. The bill will impose a state-mandated local program, compelling local agencies and school districts to comply with the new transfer requirements. Moreover, the California Constitution mandates that the state reimburse local agencies for certain costs arising from the implementation of this law, ensuring that districts are not financially burdened by these mandates.

Summary

Assembly Bill 237 (AB 237) addresses pupil attendance by amending regulations surrounding intradistrict and interdistrict transfers, particularly for low-performing students. The bill mandates that school districts must approve intradistrict transfer requests for low-performing pupils who are enrolled in schools that have been identified in the red or orange performance bands on the California School Dashboard for three consecutive years. Consequently, this aims to provide these students with options for better educational opportunities that may not be available at their current schools. The bill is an effort to address performance disparities across school districts and ensure that struggling students have a pathway to success.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 237 appears largely supportive among proponents who argue that it promotes educational equity and the welfare of students who are struggling academically. Advocates highlight that the bill provides necessary support to ensure that low-performing students can access better educational facilities. Conversely, there may be concerns among some local education authorities regarding the potential fiscal implications and administrative burdens that come with managing new transfer requests more actively.

Contention

While the bill's principle of supporting low-performing students is broadly accepted, there exist points of contention regarding its practical application, particularly the criteria for what constitutes a 'low-performing pupil'. Critics may argue about the feasibility of implementing the mandated transfers, especially considering the capacity issues that schools may face with an influx of new students. Additionally, the bill prohibits approval of transfer requests to schools also identified as low performing, raising debates about the appropriateness and effectiveness of relocating students within similarly underperforming institutions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1408

Intradistrict and interdistrict transfers: low-performing pupils.

CA AB1786

Intradistrict and interdistrict transfers: low-performing pupils.

CA AB95

Pupil nutrition: pupil meals.

CA AB76

Interdistrict transfer of pupils: prohibition on transfers by a school district of residence: in-person instruction.

CA AB1127

Interdistrict attendance: prohibition on transfers by a school district of residence.

CA AB2193

Military: State Guard.

CA AB3086

Interdistrict attendance: prohibition on transfers by a school district of residence.

MN HF2899

Fully funded summer school program created, voluntary integration and inclusion program established, voluntary metro-wide intersdistrict integration program established, diverse magnet school program established, minimum pay for teachers required, and money appropriated.