California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2388

Introduced
2/12/24  
Introduced
2/12/24  
Refer
2/26/24  
Refer
2/26/24  
Report Pass
4/9/24  
Report Pass
4/9/24  
Refer
4/11/24  
Refer
4/11/24  
Refer
5/8/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Engrossed
5/22/24  
Engrossed
5/22/24  
Refer
5/23/24  
Refer
5/23/24  
Refer
6/5/24  
Report Pass
6/19/24  
Report Pass
6/19/24  
Refer
6/19/24  
Refer
6/19/24  
Refer
7/1/24  

Caption

Information Practices Act of 1977: personal information.

Impact

If passed, AB 2388 would enhance the legal protections surrounding personal information, effectively making it illegal for agencies to sell or distribute names and addresses for any financial gain unless explicitly authorized by law. The implications of this legislation are significant, as it aligns state regulations with contemporary digital privacy standards. Additionally, this bill acknowledges the need for updated statutes to address the evolving landscape of personal data and its potential misuse.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2388, introduced by Assembly Member Joe Patterson, seeks to amend the Information Practices Act of 1977 to update and expand the definition of personal information managed by state agencies. Specifically, the bill aims to redefine personal information to encompass a broader range of data that identifies individuals, including financial details, health information, and more complex identifiers. This revision reflects growing concerns surrounding data privacy in the context of increasing digital information and commercial exploitation of personal data.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 2388 largely revolves around the importance of protecting individual privacy rights in a digital age. Supporters, including consumer rights advocates, view the bill as a necessary measure to safeguard sensitive personal information from unauthorized exploitation. However, there are concerns from some commercial sectors, which argue that the restriction on the use of personal information could hinder their ability to conduct business effectively and may impose additional compliance burdens.

Contention

Notably, AB 2388 raises questions about the balance between privacy and commerce. Opponents worry that while the intentions behind the bill are commendable, the constraints imposed could adversely affect businesses that rely on personal data for operational success. This tension highlights the ongoing debate over data rights and the extent to which regulation can promote ethical practices without stifling economic growth.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB707

Information Practices Act of 1977: commercial purposes.

CA AB2308

Information Practices Act of 1977: commercial purposes.

CA SB1276

Shared mobility service data.

CA AB726

Information Practices Act of 1977: definitions.

CA AB1436

Information privacy: digital health feedback systems.

CA AB2677

Information Practices Act of 1977.

CA AB1008

California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018: personal information.

CA AB64

Cannabis: licensure and regulation.