Developmental services: rates.
AB 2423 builds on the existing provisions of the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act, which already governs contracts with regional centers providing essential services and supports for individuals with developmental disabilities. By formalizing a process for regular assessments and updates of rate models, the bill aims to ensure that funding kept pace with actual costs and service demands. This could lead to improved financial support for service providers, which in turn enhances the quality of care and support for individuals relying on these services.
Assembly Bill No. 2423, introduced by Assemblymember Mathis, seeks to enhance the framework surrounding rates for developmental services by adding Section 4519.11 to the Welfare and Institutions Code. This new legislation mandates the State Department of Developmental Services to conduct a comprehensive review of the rate models currently in use for community-based services targeted at individuals with developmental disabilities. This review is to occur every two years starting July 1, 2025, and adjustments to provider rates will depend on state appropriations and federal funding approvals.
The overall sentiment surrounding AB 2423 appears to be positive, especially among advocates for developmental services who see the need for regular updates to funding models. Supporters argue that timely adjustments will enable better service provisions and contribute to the sustainability of community-based support systems. However, there may be concerns about ensuring adequate funding levels are appropriated in alignment with these updates, which is a point of contention for those worried about budget constraints.
A potential point of contention arising from AB 2423 could be related to the budgetary implications of the mandated updates to rate models. Critics argue that reliance on appropriation and the approval of federal funds might create inconsistencies in service provision, particularly if funding does not align with the reviewed costs. Additionally, as the bill modifies existing laws, there may be apprehensions among certain stakeholders regarding how these changes will influence current service contracts and operations.