California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2480

Introduced
2/13/24  
Introduced
2/13/24  
Refer
3/4/24  
Refer
3/4/24  
Report Pass
3/20/24  
Report Pass
3/20/24  
Refer
3/21/24  
Refer
3/21/24  
Report Pass
4/16/24  
Report Pass
4/16/24  
Refer
4/17/24  

Caption

Zero-emission schoolbus replacement grants: private contractors.

Impact

The bill expands eligibility for grants to includes private contractors that operate school transportation services, thereby facilitating a wider access to funding for transitioning to zero-emission vehicles in the school transport sector. This modifies the pre-existing framework which primarily benefited public educational institutions. By mandating a transfer of ownership of the buses to the respective school districts if the contractor fails to provide services for a minimum set period, the bill intends to ensure that taxpayers' investments are preserved and community resources remain responsive to educational needs.

Summary

AB 2480, introduced by Assembly Member Garcia, seeks to amend existing regulations concerning the replacement of heavy-duty internal combustion schoolbuses with zero-emission alternatives. The bill appropriates substantial funding – $375 million from the General Fund for the 2023-2024 fiscal year – to the State Air Resources Board, thereby enabling grants to local educational agencies and private contractors for purchasing zero-emission schoolbuses. Additionally, another $125 million is allocated for charging or fueling infrastructure to support these vehicles. This allocation aims to promote cleaner public transportation options for schools, aligning with broader environmental objectives.

Sentiment

General sentiment appears to be cautiously optimistic regarding AB 2480. Supporters hail the measure as a vital step towards reducing air pollution and enhancing the sustainability of school transportation systems. Additionally, it recognizes the role private contractors play in the education sector. However, there may be concerns about the adequacy of funding and the precise mechanisms for implementation and accountability, particularly ensuring that contractors fulfill the expected obligations to maintain service continuity.

Contention

Controversy may arise surrounding the appropriation of funds and the administrative responsibilities imposed on the State Air Resources Board and the Energy Commission. Critics could argue about the bureaucratic burden placed on these agencies by the bill's requirements to coordinate funding applications and ensure rigorous compliance with environmental standards. Further, questions regarding the long-term effectiveness of the zero-emission bus initiative in addressing air quality issues persist, as some stakeholders advocate for a more holistic approach to transportation sustainability that may not focus purely on zero-emission technologies.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1111

Pupil transportation: schoolbuses: zero-emission vehicles: extensions: scrapping.

CA SB1387

California Hybrid and Zero-Emission Truck and Bus Voucher Incentive Project: vehicle eligibility: schoolbus grant requirements.

CA SB371

Schoolbuses: stop requirements.

CA AB1744

State Air Resources Board: regulations: emissions reduction credit program.

CA AB579

Schoolbuses: zero-emission vehicles.

CA AB2731

Schoolbuses: zero-emission vehicles.

CA AB1798

Schoolbuses: passenger restraint systems.

CA AB692

Schoolbuses: passenger restraint systems.