California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2610

Introduced
2/14/24  
Introduced
2/14/24  
Refer
3/4/24  
Report Pass
4/9/24  
Report Pass
4/9/24  
Refer
4/11/24  
Refer
4/11/24  
Report Pass
4/24/24  
Engrossed
5/2/24  
Refer
5/2/24  
Refer
5/2/24  
Refer
5/15/24  
Refer
5/15/24  
Report Pass
6/18/24  
Report Pass
6/18/24  
Refer
6/18/24  
Refer
6/18/24  
Refer
8/5/24  

Caption

Protected species: authorized take: System Conservation Implementation Agreement.

Impact

The bill responds to pressing needs related to water conservation and management in the Lower Colorado River Basin, particularly as it pertains to the Salton Sea. By facilitating the take of protected species under the outlined agreements, AB 2610 is positioned to allow for necessary environmental impacts to be addressed in line with the agreements that have been enacted for the preservation of water resources. This is particularly significant for agriculture and local water management practices, which will be directly influenced by these provisions, potentially enabling better ecological outcomes in the long run.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2610, introduced by Assembly Member Garcia, aims to amend Section 2081.7 of the Fish and Game Code, focusing on the authorization of the take, or capture, of certain protected species under specific conditions in the context of significant water management agreements. The bill explicitly allows the California Department of Fish and Wildlife to permit such takes resulting from the implementation of both the Salton Sea Management Program and System Conservation Implementation Agreements, particularly involving agreements with the United States Bureau of Reclamation and the Imperial Irrigation District. These changes are seen as crucial for streamlining the processes necessary for addressing the environmental challenges facing the Salton Sea and adjacent ecosystems.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 2610 appears to be cautiously optimistic among stakeholders involved in water management and conservation. Proponents argue that its passing is a necessary step towards modernizing the regulatory framework to facilitate urgent ecological restoration efforts, especially in the face of continuing environmental concerns related to the Salton Sea. However, there are underlying tensions as conservation groups may express apprehensions about the implications of allowing the take of protected species, fearing that it could undermine broader conservation initiatives.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding AB 2610 arise from the complex balance between the necessity of water management and the protection of endangered species. Critics may argue that by allowing for the take of species, the bill could lead to adverse effects on biodiversity and undermine existing conservation laws. As such, while the urgency of the situation surrounding the Salton Sea is acknowledged, the ethical implications of permitting species take could spark important discussions among environmental advocates and policymakers on the best strategies for achieving both public and ecological health.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB615

Salton Sea restoration.

CA SB1493

Public resources.

CA SB583

Salton Sea Conservancy.

CA SB701

Salton Sea Obligations Act of 2018.

AZ SB1480

Watershed health; use; survey