California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2622

Introduced
2/14/24  
Introduced
2/14/24  
Refer
3/4/24  
Refer
3/4/24  
Report Pass
4/23/24  
Report Pass
4/23/24  
Refer
4/25/24  
Refer
4/25/24  
Refer
5/8/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Engrossed
5/22/24  
Engrossed
5/22/24  
Refer
5/23/24  
Refer
5/23/24  
Refer
6/5/24  
Refer
6/5/24  
Report Pass
6/27/24  
Report Pass
6/27/24  
Refer
6/27/24  
Refer
6/27/24  
Report Pass
7/1/24  
Report Pass
7/1/24  
Refer
7/1/24  
Refer
7/1/24  
Refer
8/5/24  
Refer
8/5/24  
Report Pass
8/15/24  
Report Pass
8/15/24  
Enrolled
8/22/24  
Enrolled
8/22/24  
Chaptered
9/14/24  
Passed
9/14/24  

Caption

Contractors: exemptions: work and advertisements.

Impact

The impact of AB 2622 on state laws centers around the modification of contractor licensing regulations. By raising the threshold for unlicensed work, the bill seeks to streamline the ability for individuals to engage in low-cost construction without the burdens of licensing, potentially increasing accessibility to building services for small projects. However, this change narrows the licensing requirements, which some argue could lead to an increase in unregulated construction work that may not meet safety standards or local codes.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2622, introduced by Juan Carrillo, amends existing provisions of the Contractors State License Law, principally focusing on the licensure and regulation of contractors in California. The bill revises the exemption threshold for unlicensed contractors from an aggregate contract price of $500 to $1,000. It is designed to allow individuals without a contractor's license to perform certain construction-related tasks without facing legal penalties for contracts that fall under this new price limit, provided that the work does not require a building permit.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2622 appears to be mixed among stakeholders. Supporters, including some small contractors and trade organizations, argue that the provisions of the bill could alleviate financial burdens for minor jobs, thereby promoting local economic activity. Conversely, opponents, particularly from regulatory bodies and safety advocates, express concern that relaxing licensing requirements might undermine quality assurance and public safety in construction work, exposing consumers to risks.

Contention

Notable points of contention in the discussions surrounding the bill involve the implications of allowing unlicensed individuals to perform more extensive work without oversight and the potential for escalating the number of poorly constructed projects due to lower regulatory scrutiny. Critics fear that the broader opportunity for unlicensed contractors could lead to legal and compliance issues in future disputes, raising questions about the accountability of workers performing significant work without proper licensing.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB304

Contractors: exemptions.

CA SB626

Department of Water Resources: Procurement Methods.

CA SB1309

Outdoor advertising displays: exemptions.

CA AB1874

Contractors: unlicensed work.

CA SB369

Salton Sea: restoration projects: skilled and trained workforce.

CA AB899

Contractors: unlicensed work: inflation adjustment.

CA AB692

Employment: contracts in restraint of trade.

CA SB984

Public agencies: project labor agreements.