California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2634

Introduced
2/14/24  
Introduced
2/14/24  
Refer
3/4/24  
Refer
3/4/24  
Report Pass
4/2/24  
Report Pass
4/2/24  
Refer
4/3/24  
Refer
4/3/24  
Report Pass
4/11/24  
Report Pass
4/11/24  
Refer
4/11/24  
Report Pass
4/23/24  
Report Pass
4/23/24  
Engrossed
5/2/24  
Engrossed
5/2/24  
Refer
5/2/24  
Refer
5/2/24  
Refer
5/15/24  
Refer
5/15/24  
Report Pass
5/29/24  
Enrolled
6/17/24  
Enrolled
6/17/24  
Chaptered
7/15/24  
Chaptered
7/15/24  
Passed
7/15/24  

Caption

Sacramento Regional Transit District.

Impact

The bill affects important transportation policies by allowing the Sacramento Regional Transit District greater discretion in fare pricing for seniors compared to disabled individuals and veterans. While it is seen as necessary for adapting transit policies to regional needs, the exemption also raises concerns regarding equity in fare accessibility for all vulnerable groups. The bill requires the district to submit a comprehensive report if it reduces fares for seniors below those for disabled persons or veterans, which could inform future legislative actions and fare policies.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 2634, authored by McCarty, relates specifically to the Sacramento Regional Transit District. The bill primarily amends sections of existing law regarding public contracts and transportation fare policies. One major provision allows the district to exempt itself from the requirement to offer reduced fares to disabled persons and disabled veterans at the same rate as senior citizens until January 1, 2027. This exception acknowledges the unique demographics and needs of the Sacramento region, as indicated in the legislative findings.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2634 is mixed. Supporters argue that it provides necessary flexibility for the district to manage its operations efficiently and respond to community needs. However, opponents express concerns that the bill potentially marginalizes disabled individuals and veterans, who may not receive equal benefits from fare discounts. This highlights an ongoing debate between enhancing operational efficiency and ensuring fair treatment for all riders, particularly those with disabilities.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the provision allowing emergency spending without competitive bidding under certain circumstances, which critics fear could lead to a lack of oversight and potential misuse of funds. Additionally, the decision to exempt certain fare policies for vulnerable populations may create divisions in community trust about the transit system's commitment to serving all residents equitably. The fact that the law is temporary and set to expire in 2027 adds another layer of complexity, as stakeholders advocate for more permanent solutions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB205

Local Government Omnibus Act of 2017.

CA AB2836

Carl Moyer Memorial Air Quality Standards Attainment Program: vehicle registration fees: California tire fee.

CA AB1811

Local flood protection: planning: climate change.

CA AB2015

Sacramento Regional Transit District: board of directors: voting procedures: contracting authority: retirement board.

CA SB605

State attorneys and administrative law judges: compensation.

CA AB157

State government.

CA SB157

Crime prevention: enforcement and training programs.

CA AB1609

Air pollution: motor vehicle registration: pollution reduction.