California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2812

Introduced
2/15/24  
Introduced
2/15/24  
Refer
3/11/24  
Refer
3/11/24  
Report Pass
3/11/24  
Report Pass
3/11/24  
Refer
3/12/24  
Refer
3/12/24  
Report Pass
4/11/24  
Report Pass
4/11/24  
Engrossed
4/18/24  
Engrossed
4/18/24  
Refer
4/18/24  
Refer
4/18/24  
Refer
5/1/24  
Refer
5/1/24  
Report Pass
5/29/24  
Report Pass
5/29/24  
Enrolled
6/6/24  
Chaptered
6/14/24  
Chaptered
6/14/24  
Passed
6/14/24  

Caption

Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority.

Impact

The bill is designed to streamline the procurement process for the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority while promoting competitive bidding. By raising the thresholds for bidding, AB 2812 aims to reduce the administrative burden on the VTA for lower-value contracts, allowing more flexibility in their operations. This adjustment may result in increased efficiency and responsiveness in executing transportation projects and services, essential for addressing the needs of public transit in the Santa Clara region.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2812, introduced by Assemblymember Kalra, amends Section 20301 of the Public Contract Code concerning the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA). The bill sets forth new thresholds for bidding on contracts related to the purchase of supplies, equipment, and materials, increasing the minimum contract amount for public bidding from $150,000 to $200,000. It also stipulates that the VTA must obtain at least three quotations for any contracts ranging from $5,000 to $200,000, ensuring a degree of competition and value assessment in the procurement process.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2812 appears generally positive among supporters, who view it as a necessary adaptation to improve operational efficiencies without compromising the quality and accountability of public procurement. However, concerns may arise from opposition regarding the potential implications of higher contract thresholds on fairness and transparency in bid selection processes. Stakeholders emphasize that while reducing red tape is beneficial, it must not come at the cost of reduced oversight or the opportunity for smaller contractors to compete.

Contention

Notable points of contention may include the interpretation of 'best value' in bid assessments, as the authorities have discretion in determining which bid offers the most advantageous blends of quality, price, and other factors. This discretion could lead to debates about favoritism or transparency in the selection process. Given the public nature of contracts under the VTA's jurisdiction, any proposed changes can stir concerns about potential inequities in access to contract opportunities for various suppliers and contractors.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2590

San Bernardino County Transportation Authority: contracting.

CA SB622

Local Agency Public Construction Act: Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District.

CA AB1205

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority: contracting.

CA AB2271

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority: contracting: local businesses.

CA AB3177

North County Transit District: contracting.