California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB289

Introduced
1/25/23  
Refer
2/2/23  
Introduced
1/25/23  
Report Pass
3/2/23  
Refer
2/2/23  
Report Pass
3/2/23  
Report Pass
3/2/23  
Refer
3/6/23  
Refer
3/6/23  
Refer
3/6/23  
Report Pass
3/7/23  
Report Pass
3/7/23  
Report Pass
3/7/23  
Refer
3/8/23  
Refer
3/8/23  
Report Pass
3/15/23  
Report Pass
3/15/23  
Report Pass
3/22/23  
Refer
3/15/23  
Refer
3/15/23  
Engrossed
3/30/23  
Report Pass
3/22/23  
Report Pass
3/22/23  
Engrossed
3/30/23  
Refer
5/3/23  
Refer
3/30/23  
Refer
3/30/23  
Refer
5/3/23  
Report Pass
6/7/23  
Refer
5/3/23  
Report Pass
6/7/23  
Refer
6/7/23  
Refer
6/7/23  
Refer
8/14/23  
Refer
8/14/23  
Report Pass
9/1/23  
Refer
8/14/23  
Report Pass
9/1/23  
Report Pass
9/1/23  
Enrolled
9/11/23  
Enrolled
9/11/23  
Chaptered
10/8/23  
Chaptered
10/8/23  
Passed
10/8/23  

Caption

Mental health services: representation.

Impact

The introduction of this bill could significantly transform the approach to mental health services within the community framework by enforcing inclusivity. By requiring broader stakeholder engagement, AB 289 aims to address potential disparities in mental health services and ensure that programs are more responsive to the needs of diverse populations. Moreover, if determined to incur state-mandated costs, counties may be eligible for reimbursement, thus facilitating compliance and implementation without imposing undue financial burdens on local agencies.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 289, introduced by Holden, aims to amend Section 5848 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, focusing on enhancing representation in mental health services across California. This legislation builds upon existing frameworks established by the Bronzan-McCorquodale Act and the Mental Health Services Act, ensuring that community mental health programs are operated with local control yet further emphasizes the need for diverse stakeholder involvement. The key change proposed by AB 289 mandates that counties include representatives from historically marginalized groups, including racially and ethnically diverse communities and LGBTQ+ youth, during the planning phases of mental health services.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding AB 289 appears positive, especially among advocates for mental health and social equity. Supporters stress the importance of inclusive representation in service planning and delivery, promoting a holistic approach to mental health that acknowledges the voices of all community members, especially those historically overlooked. However, some local governments may express concerns regarding the administrative burden and complexity of the new requirements, potentially framing the bill as an additional regulatory obligation.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the challenges local agencies might face in fulfilling the new stakeholder consultation requirements, especially concerning logistics and the balance of varied viewpoints in decision-making. While proponents advocate for the necessity of diverse perspectives in mental health service planning, critics worry that the process may become unwieldy, delaying essential services. Ultimately, how effectively these new measures can be integrated into existing frameworks will be crucial in determining the overall success of AB 289.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1352

Community mental health services: mental health boards.

CA AB43

Mental health.

CA SB970

Mental Health Services Act.

CA AB2287

Mental Health Services Act: transparency and accountability.

CA SB326

The Behavioral Health Services Act.

CA AB488

Mental Health Services Act.