California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2899

Introduced
2/15/24  
Introduced
2/15/24  
Refer
3/11/24  
Refer
3/11/24  
Report Pass
3/11/24  
Refer
3/12/24  
Refer
3/12/24  
Report Pass
4/1/24  
Report Pass
4/1/24  
Refer
4/2/24  
Report Pass
4/10/24  
Report Pass
4/10/24  
Refer
4/15/24  
Refer
4/15/24  
Refer
5/1/24  
Refer
5/1/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Engrossed
5/22/24  
Engrossed
5/22/24  
Refer
5/23/24  
Refer
6/5/24  
Report Pass
6/26/24  
Report Pass
6/26/24  
Refer
6/26/24  
Refer
6/26/24  
Refer
8/5/24  
Refer
8/5/24  
Report Pass
8/15/24  
Enrolled
8/21/24  
Enrolled
8/21/24  
Vetoed
9/25/24  

Caption

General acute care hospitals: licensed nurse-to-patient ratios.

Impact

The impact of AB 2899 extends to the Health and Safety Code, specifically by adding Section 1276.45. This section mandates that if a violation is found and no fine is imposed, the department must provide a detailed statement explaining why. This reasoning must cover investigatory steps taken and any mitigating factors considered which could support the decision. By enhancing the communication of findings and actions taken by the department, the bill hopes to foster greater accountability and openness regarding compliance with nurse-to-patient ratios.

Summary

AB 2899, introduced by Assembly Member Gabriel on February 15, 2024, aims to enhance transparency in the handling of violations of licensed nurse-to-patient ratio regulations within general acute care hospitals in California. The bill mandates that when the State Department of Public Health communicates actions to take on substantiated violations, it must simultaneously notify the individual who reported the violation and their collective bargaining agent, if applicable. This requirement for simultaneous communication is intended to keep all stakeholders informed and involved in the enforcement process.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2899 appears positive among those advocating for better transparency and accountability within healthcare facilities. Supporters argue that by ensuring timely notification to concerned parties, the bill aims to empower healthcare workers and advocates with information regarding patient care standards. Conversely, some opponents might express concerns about the administrative burden this could place on healthcare facilities and the possibility of creating avenues for increased litigation based on the detailed reasoning provided for non-fines.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential administrative overhead for the State Department of Public Health and hospitals, particularly as healthcare systems already face significant challenges and scrutiny. Critics may argue that the requirements for detailed explanations could lead to unnecessary complications in the enforcement of regulations. The balance between ensuring patient care standards and operational feasibility may remain a topic of significant debate as the bill is implemented.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1581

School districts: reorganization.

NC H988

2024 Retirement Technical Corrections

MI HR0165

A resolution directing the impeachment of Dana M. Nessel, Attorney General of the state of Michigan, for corrupt conduct in office.

CA AB1147

School districts: reorganization: State Department of Education approval process.

CA AB450

Paramedic Disciplinary Review Board.

CA SCR71

Childhood Cancer Awareness Month.

CA AB1692

Petitions: filings.

CO HB1192

Additional Protections In Consumer Code