California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2916

Introduced
2/15/24  
Introduced
2/15/24  
Refer
3/11/24  
Report Pass
4/15/24  
Refer
4/16/24  
Refer
4/16/24  
Report Pass
4/24/24  
Report Pass
4/24/24  
Refer
4/24/24  
Refer
5/8/24  

Caption

Environmental health: floating devices: expanded polystyrene.

Impact

The implementation of AB 2916 will directly affect manufacturers, suppliers, and users of floating devices made with expanded polystyrene in California. The new regulations are expected to result in a significant shift toward more environmentally friendly materials in the construction of such devices. The State Water Resources Control Board will be tasked with enforcing these provisions, maintaining a list of approved materials, and ensuring compliance through the imposition of civil penalties for violations, which could reach up to $10,000 per occurrence. This could ultimately foster a broader initiative toward ecological sustainability within state law.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2916, proposed by Assembly Member Friedman, seeks to enhance environmental health by regulating the use of expanded polystyrene in floating devices, including buoys, docks, and piers. The bill mandates that starting January 1, 2026, any such floating device containing expanded polystyrene must be fully encased in specific materials—aluminum, concrete, steel, or certain plastics with a minimal thickness to prevent environmental contamination. The purpose of this regulation is to mitigate the impact of expanded polystyrene on aquatic ecosystems and ensure that any maintenance or repairs conform to these standards even for existing structures.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2916 appears to be generally supportive among environmental advocacy groups who view the bill as a critical step in reducing pollution and protecting aquatic habitats. However, there may be concerns expressed by industry stakeholders about the practicalities and potential economic impacts of transitioning away from commonly used materials like expanded polystyrene. The balance between ecological needs and economic considerations is likely to be a point of contention in legislative discussions.

Contention

Notable points of contention include discussions on defining acceptable materials for encasing expanded polystyrene and the implications for the construction and repair of existing floating devices. Additionally, the bill's approach may lay the groundwork for further regulations impacting other industries reliant on polystyrene, which advocates argue could unnecessarily burden economic activity in a state that is already heavily regulated. As such, ensuring stakeholder engagement and addressing economic concerns will be vital to successful implementation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB378

State parks: state beaches: expanded polystyrene food container and cooler ban.

CT SB00118

An Act Concerning The Use Of Certain Polystyrene Products.

CT HB06606

An Act Concerning The Use Of Certain Products Made From Polystyrene.

US SB897

Farewell to Foam Act of 2025

CT SB00099

An Act Concerning The Use And Distribution Of Polystyrene Products.

US HB1918

Farewell to Foam Act of 2025

AZ SB1359

Polystyrene foam food packaging; prohibition

AZ SB1101

Polystyrene foam food packaging; prohibition