If enacted, AB 3065 would amend the Health and Safety Code to add a new section allowing retail sales of fireworks during the specified dates provided that the sale is authorized by a local ordinance. This legislation would allow municipalities to regulate the hours of use, aiming to balance festive celebrations with public safety concerns. Importantly, the bill stipulates that violators of illegal sales or use of fireworks would face misdemeanor charges, reinforcing the legal framework surrounding fireworks distribution and safety.
As of the last recorded vote on April 22, 2024, AB 3065 achieved a unanimous 'do pass' recommendation with a vote count of 5 yeas and no nays, signaling broad support among committee members, yet it remains to be seen how it will fare in the broader legislative process as it progresses through further committee reviews.
Assembly Bill 3065, introduced by Assembly Member Garcia, aims to expand the legal framework for the retail sale of safe and sane fireworks in California. The bill permits the sale of certified fireworks from December 26 to January 1, accommodating potential local restrictions on hours of use via city or county ordinances. This aligns with the existing practice that allows similar sales from June 28 to July 6 annually, thus extending the celebratory periods during which fireworks can legally be sold, specifically targeting the New Year celebrations.
One of the notable points of contention surrounding AB 3065 is whether local jurisdictions should retain control over fireworks regulations. Allowing local ordinances to govern sales could lead to a patchwork of rules across the state, potentially confusing consumers and enforcement entities. Supporters argue that extending the sale period allows for safe and responsible celebrations, while opponents may view it as a risk to public safety and local control, especially in communities with significant fire hazards or noise concerns. Additionally, the bill specifies that there is no requirement for the state to reimburse local governments for costs incurred in connection with this new legislation, which may raise questions about local budgeting and enforcement responsibilities.