This bill is largely procedural, focusing primarily on clarifying language within the Government Code without introducing substantive changes to the law itself. As such, its impact on current state laws is expected to be minimal; it does not propose significant alterations to existing regulations or procedures. By maintaining consistency in how singular and plural terms are treated, the bill aims to prevent potential misinterpretations of the law, which is crucial for legal practitioners and officials who rely on precise language in governance.
Summary
Assembly Bill No. 3128, introduced by Assembly Member Hart, seeks to amend Section 13 of the California Government Code. The existing provision specifies that the singular form encompasses the plural form and vice versa. AB 3128 proposes a nonsubstantive change to this provision, aiming to clarify or simplify the legal language used within the code. The intent behind this amendment appears to be enhancing the comprehensibility of legal texts as they pertain to state governance.
Contention
Since AB 3128 is a nonsubstantive change, it is unlikely to provoke significant contention or debate among legislators. The nature of the amendments suggests a consensus on the importance of clear legal language rather than a divergence of opinions on policy matters. However, it is essential to consider that even minor amendments to legal frameworks can lead to discussions about clarity, accessibility, and potential oversights in legislative language—important factors for future legal interpretations.