California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB3187 Compare Versions

Only one version of the bill is available at this time.
OldNewDifferences
11 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20232024 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 3187Introduced by Assembly Member Juan CarrilloFebruary 16, 2024 An act to amend Section 116355 of the Health and Safety Code, relating to drinking water. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 3187, as introduced, Juan Carrillo. Safe Drinking Water Plan.Existing law declares it to be the established policy of the state that every human being has the right to safe, clean, affordable, and accessible water adequate for human consumption, cooking, and sanitary purposes. The California Safe Drinking Water Act requires the State Water Resources Control Board to maintain a drinking water program and carry out various duties, responsibilities, and functions relating to drinking water, including submission to the Legislature, every 5 years, of a comprehensive Safe Drinking Water Plan for California.This bill would make nonsubstantive changes to the provision requiring submission of a Safe Drinking Water Plan.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: NO Local Program: NO Bill TextThe people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 116355 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:116355. (a) Once every five years years, the state board shall submit to the Legislature a comprehensive Safe Drinking Water Plan for California.(b) The Safe Drinking Water Plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following information:(1) An analysis of the overall quality of Californias drinking water and the identification of specific water quality problems.(2) Types and levels of contaminants found in public drinking water systems that have less fewer than 10,000 service connections. The discussion of these water systems shall include the following:(A) Estimated costs of requiring these systems to meet primary drinking water standards and public health goals.(B) Recommendations for actions that could be taken by the Legislature, the department, state board, and these systems to improve water quality.(3) A discussion and analysis of the known and potential health risks that may be associated with drinking water contamination in California.(4) An evaluation of how existing water quality information systems currently maintained by local or state agencies can be more effectively used to protect drinking water.(5) An evaluation of the research needed to develop inexpensive methods and instruments to ensure better screening and detection of waterborne chemicals, and inexpensive detection methods that could be used by small utilities and consumers to detect harmful microbial agents in drinking water.(6) An analysis of the technical and economic viability and the health benefits of various treatment techniques that can be used to reduce levels of trihalomethanes, lead, nitrates, synthetic organic chemicals, micro-organisms, and other contaminants in drinking water.(7) A discussion of alternative methods of financing the construction, installation, and operation of new treatment technologies, including, but not limited to to, user charges, state or local taxes, state planning and construction grants, loans, and loan guarantees.(8) A discussion of sources of revenue presently available, and projected to be available, to public water systems to meet current and future expenses.(9) An analysis of the current cost of drinking water paid by residential, business, and industrial consumers based on a statewide survey of large, medium, and small public water systems.(10) Specific recommendations, including recommendations developed pursuant to paragraph (6), to improve the quality of drinking water in California and a detailed five-year implementation program.(11) A review of the use of administrators pursuant to Section 116686 in the state, including, but not limited to, the number of communities that have achieved access to safe drinking water through use of an administrator, the costs and duties of the administrator and a comparison of costs, whether rate structures for communities served by an administrator have resulted in significantly higher rates and whether those rates are affordable, and whether the administrator program should be modified to better serve communities.(12) A review of the consolidations pursuant to Section 116682 in the state, including, but not limited to, the number of communities that have achieved access to safe drinking water through consolidation, whether rate structures for communities are affordable following consolidation, barriers to consolidation, and whether the consolidation program should be modified to better serve communities.
22
33 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20232024 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 3187Introduced by Assembly Member Juan CarrilloFebruary 16, 2024 An act to amend Section 116355 of the Health and Safety Code, relating to drinking water. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 3187, as introduced, Juan Carrillo. Safe Drinking Water Plan.Existing law declares it to be the established policy of the state that every human being has the right to safe, clean, affordable, and accessible water adequate for human consumption, cooking, and sanitary purposes. The California Safe Drinking Water Act requires the State Water Resources Control Board to maintain a drinking water program and carry out various duties, responsibilities, and functions relating to drinking water, including submission to the Legislature, every 5 years, of a comprehensive Safe Drinking Water Plan for California.This bill would make nonsubstantive changes to the provision requiring submission of a Safe Drinking Water Plan.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: NO Local Program: NO
44
55
66
77
88
99 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20232024 REGULAR SESSION
1010
1111 Assembly Bill
1212
1313 No. 3187
1414
1515 Introduced by Assembly Member Juan CarrilloFebruary 16, 2024
1616
1717 Introduced by Assembly Member Juan Carrillo
1818 February 16, 2024
1919
2020 An act to amend Section 116355 of the Health and Safety Code, relating to drinking water.
2121
2222 LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
2323
2424 ## LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
2525
2626 AB 3187, as introduced, Juan Carrillo. Safe Drinking Water Plan.
2727
2828 Existing law declares it to be the established policy of the state that every human being has the right to safe, clean, affordable, and accessible water adequate for human consumption, cooking, and sanitary purposes. The California Safe Drinking Water Act requires the State Water Resources Control Board to maintain a drinking water program and carry out various duties, responsibilities, and functions relating to drinking water, including submission to the Legislature, every 5 years, of a comprehensive Safe Drinking Water Plan for California.This bill would make nonsubstantive changes to the provision requiring submission of a Safe Drinking Water Plan.
2929
3030 Existing law declares it to be the established policy of the state that every human being has the right to safe, clean, affordable, and accessible water adequate for human consumption, cooking, and sanitary purposes. The California Safe Drinking Water Act requires the State Water Resources Control Board to maintain a drinking water program and carry out various duties, responsibilities, and functions relating to drinking water, including submission to the Legislature, every 5 years, of a comprehensive Safe Drinking Water Plan for California.
3131
3232 This bill would make nonsubstantive changes to the provision requiring submission of a Safe Drinking Water Plan.
3333
3434 ## Digest Key
3535
3636 ## Bill Text
3737
3838 The people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 116355 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:116355. (a) Once every five years years, the state board shall submit to the Legislature a comprehensive Safe Drinking Water Plan for California.(b) The Safe Drinking Water Plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following information:(1) An analysis of the overall quality of Californias drinking water and the identification of specific water quality problems.(2) Types and levels of contaminants found in public drinking water systems that have less fewer than 10,000 service connections. The discussion of these water systems shall include the following:(A) Estimated costs of requiring these systems to meet primary drinking water standards and public health goals.(B) Recommendations for actions that could be taken by the Legislature, the department, state board, and these systems to improve water quality.(3) A discussion and analysis of the known and potential health risks that may be associated with drinking water contamination in California.(4) An evaluation of how existing water quality information systems currently maintained by local or state agencies can be more effectively used to protect drinking water.(5) An evaluation of the research needed to develop inexpensive methods and instruments to ensure better screening and detection of waterborne chemicals, and inexpensive detection methods that could be used by small utilities and consumers to detect harmful microbial agents in drinking water.(6) An analysis of the technical and economic viability and the health benefits of various treatment techniques that can be used to reduce levels of trihalomethanes, lead, nitrates, synthetic organic chemicals, micro-organisms, and other contaminants in drinking water.(7) A discussion of alternative methods of financing the construction, installation, and operation of new treatment technologies, including, but not limited to to, user charges, state or local taxes, state planning and construction grants, loans, and loan guarantees.(8) A discussion of sources of revenue presently available, and projected to be available, to public water systems to meet current and future expenses.(9) An analysis of the current cost of drinking water paid by residential, business, and industrial consumers based on a statewide survey of large, medium, and small public water systems.(10) Specific recommendations, including recommendations developed pursuant to paragraph (6), to improve the quality of drinking water in California and a detailed five-year implementation program.(11) A review of the use of administrators pursuant to Section 116686 in the state, including, but not limited to, the number of communities that have achieved access to safe drinking water through use of an administrator, the costs and duties of the administrator and a comparison of costs, whether rate structures for communities served by an administrator have resulted in significantly higher rates and whether those rates are affordable, and whether the administrator program should be modified to better serve communities.(12) A review of the consolidations pursuant to Section 116682 in the state, including, but not limited to, the number of communities that have achieved access to safe drinking water through consolidation, whether rate structures for communities are affordable following consolidation, barriers to consolidation, and whether the consolidation program should be modified to better serve communities.
3939
4040 The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
4141
4242 ## The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
4343
4444 SECTION 1. Section 116355 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:116355. (a) Once every five years years, the state board shall submit to the Legislature a comprehensive Safe Drinking Water Plan for California.(b) The Safe Drinking Water Plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following information:(1) An analysis of the overall quality of Californias drinking water and the identification of specific water quality problems.(2) Types and levels of contaminants found in public drinking water systems that have less fewer than 10,000 service connections. The discussion of these water systems shall include the following:(A) Estimated costs of requiring these systems to meet primary drinking water standards and public health goals.(B) Recommendations for actions that could be taken by the Legislature, the department, state board, and these systems to improve water quality.(3) A discussion and analysis of the known and potential health risks that may be associated with drinking water contamination in California.(4) An evaluation of how existing water quality information systems currently maintained by local or state agencies can be more effectively used to protect drinking water.(5) An evaluation of the research needed to develop inexpensive methods and instruments to ensure better screening and detection of waterborne chemicals, and inexpensive detection methods that could be used by small utilities and consumers to detect harmful microbial agents in drinking water.(6) An analysis of the technical and economic viability and the health benefits of various treatment techniques that can be used to reduce levels of trihalomethanes, lead, nitrates, synthetic organic chemicals, micro-organisms, and other contaminants in drinking water.(7) A discussion of alternative methods of financing the construction, installation, and operation of new treatment technologies, including, but not limited to to, user charges, state or local taxes, state planning and construction grants, loans, and loan guarantees.(8) A discussion of sources of revenue presently available, and projected to be available, to public water systems to meet current and future expenses.(9) An analysis of the current cost of drinking water paid by residential, business, and industrial consumers based on a statewide survey of large, medium, and small public water systems.(10) Specific recommendations, including recommendations developed pursuant to paragraph (6), to improve the quality of drinking water in California and a detailed five-year implementation program.(11) A review of the use of administrators pursuant to Section 116686 in the state, including, but not limited to, the number of communities that have achieved access to safe drinking water through use of an administrator, the costs and duties of the administrator and a comparison of costs, whether rate structures for communities served by an administrator have resulted in significantly higher rates and whether those rates are affordable, and whether the administrator program should be modified to better serve communities.(12) A review of the consolidations pursuant to Section 116682 in the state, including, but not limited to, the number of communities that have achieved access to safe drinking water through consolidation, whether rate structures for communities are affordable following consolidation, barriers to consolidation, and whether the consolidation program should be modified to better serve communities.
4545
4646 SECTION 1. Section 116355 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:
4747
4848 ### SECTION 1.
4949
5050 116355. (a) Once every five years years, the state board shall submit to the Legislature a comprehensive Safe Drinking Water Plan for California.(b) The Safe Drinking Water Plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following information:(1) An analysis of the overall quality of Californias drinking water and the identification of specific water quality problems.(2) Types and levels of contaminants found in public drinking water systems that have less fewer than 10,000 service connections. The discussion of these water systems shall include the following:(A) Estimated costs of requiring these systems to meet primary drinking water standards and public health goals.(B) Recommendations for actions that could be taken by the Legislature, the department, state board, and these systems to improve water quality.(3) A discussion and analysis of the known and potential health risks that may be associated with drinking water contamination in California.(4) An evaluation of how existing water quality information systems currently maintained by local or state agencies can be more effectively used to protect drinking water.(5) An evaluation of the research needed to develop inexpensive methods and instruments to ensure better screening and detection of waterborne chemicals, and inexpensive detection methods that could be used by small utilities and consumers to detect harmful microbial agents in drinking water.(6) An analysis of the technical and economic viability and the health benefits of various treatment techniques that can be used to reduce levels of trihalomethanes, lead, nitrates, synthetic organic chemicals, micro-organisms, and other contaminants in drinking water.(7) A discussion of alternative methods of financing the construction, installation, and operation of new treatment technologies, including, but not limited to to, user charges, state or local taxes, state planning and construction grants, loans, and loan guarantees.(8) A discussion of sources of revenue presently available, and projected to be available, to public water systems to meet current and future expenses.(9) An analysis of the current cost of drinking water paid by residential, business, and industrial consumers based on a statewide survey of large, medium, and small public water systems.(10) Specific recommendations, including recommendations developed pursuant to paragraph (6), to improve the quality of drinking water in California and a detailed five-year implementation program.(11) A review of the use of administrators pursuant to Section 116686 in the state, including, but not limited to, the number of communities that have achieved access to safe drinking water through use of an administrator, the costs and duties of the administrator and a comparison of costs, whether rate structures for communities served by an administrator have resulted in significantly higher rates and whether those rates are affordable, and whether the administrator program should be modified to better serve communities.(12) A review of the consolidations pursuant to Section 116682 in the state, including, but not limited to, the number of communities that have achieved access to safe drinking water through consolidation, whether rate structures for communities are affordable following consolidation, barriers to consolidation, and whether the consolidation program should be modified to better serve communities.
5151
5252 116355. (a) Once every five years years, the state board shall submit to the Legislature a comprehensive Safe Drinking Water Plan for California.(b) The Safe Drinking Water Plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following information:(1) An analysis of the overall quality of Californias drinking water and the identification of specific water quality problems.(2) Types and levels of contaminants found in public drinking water systems that have less fewer than 10,000 service connections. The discussion of these water systems shall include the following:(A) Estimated costs of requiring these systems to meet primary drinking water standards and public health goals.(B) Recommendations for actions that could be taken by the Legislature, the department, state board, and these systems to improve water quality.(3) A discussion and analysis of the known and potential health risks that may be associated with drinking water contamination in California.(4) An evaluation of how existing water quality information systems currently maintained by local or state agencies can be more effectively used to protect drinking water.(5) An evaluation of the research needed to develop inexpensive methods and instruments to ensure better screening and detection of waterborne chemicals, and inexpensive detection methods that could be used by small utilities and consumers to detect harmful microbial agents in drinking water.(6) An analysis of the technical and economic viability and the health benefits of various treatment techniques that can be used to reduce levels of trihalomethanes, lead, nitrates, synthetic organic chemicals, micro-organisms, and other contaminants in drinking water.(7) A discussion of alternative methods of financing the construction, installation, and operation of new treatment technologies, including, but not limited to to, user charges, state or local taxes, state planning and construction grants, loans, and loan guarantees.(8) A discussion of sources of revenue presently available, and projected to be available, to public water systems to meet current and future expenses.(9) An analysis of the current cost of drinking water paid by residential, business, and industrial consumers based on a statewide survey of large, medium, and small public water systems.(10) Specific recommendations, including recommendations developed pursuant to paragraph (6), to improve the quality of drinking water in California and a detailed five-year implementation program.(11) A review of the use of administrators pursuant to Section 116686 in the state, including, but not limited to, the number of communities that have achieved access to safe drinking water through use of an administrator, the costs and duties of the administrator and a comparison of costs, whether rate structures for communities served by an administrator have resulted in significantly higher rates and whether those rates are affordable, and whether the administrator program should be modified to better serve communities.(12) A review of the consolidations pursuant to Section 116682 in the state, including, but not limited to, the number of communities that have achieved access to safe drinking water through consolidation, whether rate structures for communities are affordable following consolidation, barriers to consolidation, and whether the consolidation program should be modified to better serve communities.
5353
5454 116355. (a) Once every five years years, the state board shall submit to the Legislature a comprehensive Safe Drinking Water Plan for California.(b) The Safe Drinking Water Plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following information:(1) An analysis of the overall quality of Californias drinking water and the identification of specific water quality problems.(2) Types and levels of contaminants found in public drinking water systems that have less fewer than 10,000 service connections. The discussion of these water systems shall include the following:(A) Estimated costs of requiring these systems to meet primary drinking water standards and public health goals.(B) Recommendations for actions that could be taken by the Legislature, the department, state board, and these systems to improve water quality.(3) A discussion and analysis of the known and potential health risks that may be associated with drinking water contamination in California.(4) An evaluation of how existing water quality information systems currently maintained by local or state agencies can be more effectively used to protect drinking water.(5) An evaluation of the research needed to develop inexpensive methods and instruments to ensure better screening and detection of waterborne chemicals, and inexpensive detection methods that could be used by small utilities and consumers to detect harmful microbial agents in drinking water.(6) An analysis of the technical and economic viability and the health benefits of various treatment techniques that can be used to reduce levels of trihalomethanes, lead, nitrates, synthetic organic chemicals, micro-organisms, and other contaminants in drinking water.(7) A discussion of alternative methods of financing the construction, installation, and operation of new treatment technologies, including, but not limited to to, user charges, state or local taxes, state planning and construction grants, loans, and loan guarantees.(8) A discussion of sources of revenue presently available, and projected to be available, to public water systems to meet current and future expenses.(9) An analysis of the current cost of drinking water paid by residential, business, and industrial consumers based on a statewide survey of large, medium, and small public water systems.(10) Specific recommendations, including recommendations developed pursuant to paragraph (6), to improve the quality of drinking water in California and a detailed five-year implementation program.(11) A review of the use of administrators pursuant to Section 116686 in the state, including, but not limited to, the number of communities that have achieved access to safe drinking water through use of an administrator, the costs and duties of the administrator and a comparison of costs, whether rate structures for communities served by an administrator have resulted in significantly higher rates and whether those rates are affordable, and whether the administrator program should be modified to better serve communities.(12) A review of the consolidations pursuant to Section 116682 in the state, including, but not limited to, the number of communities that have achieved access to safe drinking water through consolidation, whether rate structures for communities are affordable following consolidation, barriers to consolidation, and whether the consolidation program should be modified to better serve communities.
5555
5656
5757
5858 116355. (a) Once every five years years, the state board shall submit to the Legislature a comprehensive Safe Drinking Water Plan for California.
5959
6060 (b) The Safe Drinking Water Plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following information:
6161
6262 (1) An analysis of the overall quality of Californias drinking water and the identification of specific water quality problems.
6363
6464 (2) Types and levels of contaminants found in public drinking water systems that have less fewer than 10,000 service connections. The discussion of these water systems shall include the following:
6565
6666 (A) Estimated costs of requiring these systems to meet primary drinking water standards and public health goals.
6767
6868 (B) Recommendations for actions that could be taken by the Legislature, the department, state board, and these systems to improve water quality.
6969
7070 (3) A discussion and analysis of the known and potential health risks that may be associated with drinking water contamination in California.
7171
7272 (4) An evaluation of how existing water quality information systems currently maintained by local or state agencies can be more effectively used to protect drinking water.
7373
7474 (5) An evaluation of the research needed to develop inexpensive methods and instruments to ensure better screening and detection of waterborne chemicals, and inexpensive detection methods that could be used by small utilities and consumers to detect harmful microbial agents in drinking water.
7575
7676 (6) An analysis of the technical and economic viability and the health benefits of various treatment techniques that can be used to reduce levels of trihalomethanes, lead, nitrates, synthetic organic chemicals, micro-organisms, and other contaminants in drinking water.
7777
7878 (7) A discussion of alternative methods of financing the construction, installation, and operation of new treatment technologies, including, but not limited to to, user charges, state or local taxes, state planning and construction grants, loans, and loan guarantees.
7979
8080 (8) A discussion of sources of revenue presently available, and projected to be available, to public water systems to meet current and future expenses.
8181
8282 (9) An analysis of the current cost of drinking water paid by residential, business, and industrial consumers based on a statewide survey of large, medium, and small public water systems.
8383
8484 (10) Specific recommendations, including recommendations developed pursuant to paragraph (6), to improve the quality of drinking water in California and a detailed five-year implementation program.
8585
8686 (11) A review of the use of administrators pursuant to Section 116686 in the state, including, but not limited to, the number of communities that have achieved access to safe drinking water through use of an administrator, the costs and duties of the administrator and a comparison of costs, whether rate structures for communities served by an administrator have resulted in significantly higher rates and whether those rates are affordable, and whether the administrator program should be modified to better serve communities.
8787
8888 (12) A review of the consolidations pursuant to Section 116682 in the state, including, but not limited to, the number of communities that have achieved access to safe drinking water through consolidation, whether rate structures for communities are affordable following consolidation, barriers to consolidation, and whether the consolidation program should be modified to better serve communities.