California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB3233

Introduced
2/16/24  
Refer
3/21/24  
Report Pass
3/21/24  
Refer
4/1/24  
Report Pass
4/9/24  
Refer
4/9/24  
Refer
4/22/24  
Refer
5/8/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Engrossed
5/22/24  
Refer
5/23/24  
Refer
6/5/24  
Report Pass
6/18/24  
Refer
6/19/24  
Report Pass
7/3/24  
Refer
7/3/24  
Refer
8/5/24  
Report Pass
8/15/24  
Enrolled
8/31/24  
Chaptered
9/25/24  

Caption

Oil and gas: operations: restrictions: local authority.

Impact

The passage of AB 3233 could lead to substantial changes in the landscape of oil and gas operations across California. By permitting local jurisdictions to enforce regulations that prioritize public health and environmental protection, the bill empowers communities to tailor their approach to energy development based on local needs and concerns. This increase in local control may lead to a marked reduction in oil and gas activities in areas where community members express concerns about health and safety, further supporting the state's broader goals of climate action and environmental sustainability.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 3233, introduced by Assemblymember Addis, is a significant legislative measure that aims to grant local entities the authority to regulate oil and gas operations within their jurisdictions. Specifically, the bill adds Section 3106.1 to the Public Resources Code, enabling cities and counties to impose more stringent restrictions on oil and gas operations than currently permitted under state law. This includes the ability to prohibit such operations entirely within their jurisdictions, which marks a notable shift in how oil and gas development is managed in California.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 3233 appears to be divided among stakeholders. Proponents, including environmental advocates and local government officials, laud the bill for empowering communities to safeguard their health and well-being. They argue that local control over oil and gas operations is essential for addressing environmental challenges and ensuring community interests are front and center. Conversely, opponents, particularly from the energy sector, express concerns that this local authority might lead to fragmented regulation and could create inconsistencies in oil and gas operations statewide.

Contention

Notable points of contention arise from the implications of local prohibitions. Critics argue that while local control can promote public health and environmental safety, it may simultaneously deter investment in oil and gas industries, impacting local economies reliant on these sectors. The bill’s provision stating that operators are responsible for well decommissioning and related measures adds another layer of complexity and potential liability for businesses operating in these local jurisdictions. The balance between community empowerment and economic viability remains a pivotal focus of debate regarding this legislation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB724

Oil and gas: wells and production facilities.

CA SB467

Expert witnesses: writ of habeas corpus.

CA SB1137

Oil and gas: operations: location restrictions: notice of intention: health protection zone: sensitive receptors.

CA SB1433

Gravity-Based Energy Storage Well Pilot Program.

AZ HB2223

Wind farms; construction; policies; procedures

AZ SB1150

Wind farms; construction; policies; procedures

CA AB1866

Oil and gas: idle wells.