Shorthand court reporters: sunset: certification.
The bill mandates several changes designed to enhance the certification process for shorthand reporters. It introduces new requirements such as the necessity for certified reporters to disclose their full names and license numbers at the beginning of proceedings, whether conducted in person or through remote technology. Furthermore, the state licensing examination is restructured to include three parts: English, Professional Practice, and Dictation/Transcription, setting a clear pathway for certification and maintaining standards in shorthand reporting.
Assembly Bill 3252, authored by Berman, is a legislative measure focused on the regulation and certification of shorthand court reporters in California. The bill extends existing provisions under the Business and Professions Code regarding the Court Reporters Board, which is responsible for the licensure and oversight of shorthand reporters. Originally set to sunset on January 1, 2025, this bill extends the deadline to January 1, 2029, ensuring the continued operation of the regulatory framework governing shorthand reporters and their practices.
Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB 3252 appears to be supportive among legislators and professionals within the court reporting field. Stakeholders advocate for the bill's provisions as a means to uphold the quality of court reporting services and to provide necessary support for low-income litigants through the established Transcript Reimbursement Fund. The fund aims to assist those unable to afford shorthand reporting services in civil cases, emphasizing access to justice.
Despite the general support, discussions may arise regarding the implications of tighter regulations on the availability and practice of shorthand reporting services. Critics may express concerns about the sustainability of the Transcript Reimbursement Fund and its capacity to support low-income litigants effectively. Furthermore, discussions regarding the financial aspects of maintaining overhead for the Court Reporters Board and ensuring compliance from reporting entities may also surface as potential points of contention moving forward.