Land use: development near military installations.
Impact
The primary aim of AB 3267 is to enhance communication between civilian public agencies and military installations regarding potential developments that could affect military operations. By ensuring that military branches are alerted to development applications near their facilities, the bill intends to integrate military operational needs with local land-use planning. Although the bill does not make significant substantive changes, it reinforces existing protocols, ensuring compliance in situations where projects may impact military activities.
Summary
Assembly Bill 3267, introduced by Assembly Member Wilson, seeks to amend Section 65944 of the Government Code, which pertains to land use in proximity to military installations. The bill stipulates that a public agency must notify the relevant branches of the United States Armed Forces once a development application is accepted as complete and identified as being within 1,000 feet of a military installation or in special use airspace. This notification must occur specifically after an application has been deemed complete, ensuring that military considerations are taken into account during the development process.
Contention
Debate around AB 3267 centers mainly on its implications for local governance and land-use rights. While supporters argue that increased communication with military entities is essential for protecting national security and military readiness, some critics may raise concerns about the bureaucratic burden it imposes on local agencies. They may argue that such notification requirements could delay crucial development projects and hinder local economic growth, particularly in urbanized areas where land is scarce. Furthermore, the bill's focus on military considerations may overshadow other community needs and priorities.