The bill enhances the existing framework by adding provisions to ensure caregiver succession plans are in place. This is significant as it addresses a critical gap in planning for the future care of individuals with developmental disabilities, particularly as they age out of family care. It also allows for the continued provision of essential services while modifying certain aspects that relate to housing and support to mitigate risks of homelessness. By enabling regional centers to assist with rent or mortgage payments under specific conditions, the bill aims to protect consumers facing housing insecurity, ensuring they receive the care they require without the fear of losing their home.
Assembly Bill 3291 amends existing laws under the Welfare and Institutions Code, specifically focusing on the services for individuals with developmental disabilities. The bill requires regional centers to ensure that when a consumer is cared for in their family home, there must be annual discussions about caregiver succession starting no later than the consumer's 22nd birthday. This aims to facilitate a smooth transition of care from one caregiver to another, ensuring continuity and stability in the support provided to individuals with developmental disabilities.
The general sentiment surrounding AB 3291 appears positive, particularly among advocates who support the focus on caregiver succession. They emphasize the importance of having a structured plan that prepares for transitions in caregiving, which can be a vulnerable phase for many individuals with developmental disabilities. However, there may be concerns regarding the resources required to effectively implement these changes, especially for regional centers that may have limited funding.
While AB 3291 is broadly supported for its intent to improve services for individuals with developmental disabilities, potential points of contention include the feasibility of implementing caregiver succession discussions from age 22 onwards, which may require significant adjustments in current practices within regional centers. Critics may argue that without appropriate staffing or resources, the execution of these plans may fall short, leading to inconsistent care for consumers. The challenge will be in balancing these requirements with the practicalities of service delivery within the existing system.