California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB436

Introduced
2/6/23  
Refer
2/17/23  
Introduced
2/6/23  
Refer
2/17/23  
Refer
2/17/23  
Report Pass
3/14/23  
Report Pass
3/14/23  
Refer
3/14/23  
Refer
3/14/23  
Report Pass
3/23/23  
Report Pass
3/23/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Engrossed
4/27/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Engrossed
4/27/23  
Refer
5/10/23  
Refer
4/27/23  
Refer
4/27/23  
Report Pass
6/14/23  
Refer
5/10/23  
Refer
5/10/23  
Report Pass
6/14/23  
Refer
6/14/23  
Report Pass
7/13/23  
Refer
6/14/23  
Report Pass
7/13/23  
Refer
7/13/23  
Refer
7/13/23  
Enrolled
9/14/23  
Enrolled
9/14/23  
Chaptered
10/13/23  
Enrolled
9/14/23  
Chaptered
10/13/23  
Passed
10/13/23  

Caption

Vehicles.

Impact

The changes proposed by AB 436 intend to streamline regulations concerning vehicle modifications and local traffic management. By removing the ability for local governments to legislate on cruising, the bill centralizes this authority, potentially reducing instances of local ordinances aimed at regulating such activities. This has implications for local governance and the flexibility of communities to address issues that may arise from cruising behavior.

Summary

Assembly Bill 436, sponsored by Assemblymember Alvarez, aims to amend Section 21100 of the Vehicle Code and repeal Section 24008, significantly affecting how local authorities can regulate vehicle-related matters. Specifically, this bill removes local authorities' authorization to adopt rules around 'cruising,' which is defined as the act of driving a vehicle in a repetitive pattern through a neighborhood primarily for the entertainment of the driver or passengers. Furthermore, it repeals existing prohibitions on operating modified vehicles that have been altered to be lower than their original design specifications.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment towards AB 436 appears to be mixed. Supporters argue that the bill simplifies regulations and eases restrictions on vehicle modifications, favoring individual freedom and innovation in vehicle design. Critics, however, express concern that repealing local control could undermine community efforts to manage traffic issues such as noise and safety related to cruising. The tension between state authority and local governance is at the core of the debate surrounding this legislation.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the implications of centralizing control over vehicle regulations at the state level, which opponents claim could stifle local responses to unique community needs. Additionally, the bill's repeal of the prohibition on operating modified vehicles raises questions about safety standards and the effectiveness of enforcement related to vehicle modifications. As it stands, if AB 436 is enacted alongside related bills, its full effects on local traffic regulation and vehicle operation will unfold in the coming legislative cycle.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB825

Vehicles: bicycles on sidewalks.

CA SB50

Vehicles: enforcement.

CA AB1773

Vehicles: electric bicycles.

CA AB729

Nonmedical marijuana: licensee regulation.

CA SB1498

Cannabis and industrial hemp: advertising: civil action.

CA AB64

Cannabis: licensure and regulation.