California Assembly Bill AB507

California 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/7/23
• Refer: 2/17/23
• Report Pass: 3/15/23
• Report Pass: 3/29/23
• Refer: 3/15/23
• Engrossed: 4/17/23
• Refer: 4/18/23
• Refer: 5/3/23
• Report Pass: 6/6/23
• Enrolled: 6/29/23
• Refer: 6/6/23
• Chaptered: 7/21/23
• Passed: 7/21/23

Caption

Presidential electors.

Impact

By updating the Elections Code with these amendments, AB 507 reinforces the structured timing and location arrangements for presidential electors. This is particularly crucial during emergencies such as natural disasters. The provision allowing the Governor to choose a safe alternative location underscores the importance of maintaining electoral integrity and accessibility under variable conditions. Such a change ensures that the democratic process continues smoothly, even in adverse situations, creating a more resilient electoral framework.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 507, approved on July 21, 2023, aims to amend certain sections of the California Elections Code regarding the meeting of presidential electors. The bill aligns California state law with federal requirements that mandate electors meet on the first Tuesday after the second Wednesday in December following their appointment. Notably, the bill adds provisions for the Governor to designate an alternative meeting location if the State Capitol is deemed unsafe due to a state of emergency, thereby enhancing the flexibility and safety of the electoral process in California.

Sentiment

The reception of AB 507 was primarily positive within legislative circles, as it garnered unanimous support during voting, with all members present voting in favor. This reflects a collective recognition of the bill's importance in safeguarding electoral proceedings and adapting them to contemporary challenges. There were no notable points of contention highlighted in discussions related to this bill, indicating a consensus on its necessity and functionality.

Contention

As the bill passed without opposition, there were no significant contentions reported regarding its provisions. Its alignment with federal laws and the practical measures it introduces, such as the emergency meeting provision, were well-received. The unanimous support suggests a shared belief among lawmakers that the functionality and safety of the electoral process are paramount and should be protected from unforeseen circumstances.