California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB534

Introduced
2/8/23  
Refer
2/17/23  
Introduced
2/8/23  
Introduced
2/8/23  
Refer
2/17/23  
Refer
2/17/23  
Report Pass
3/8/23  
Report Pass
3/8/23  
Refer
3/9/23  
Report Pass
3/16/23  
Refer
3/9/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Report Pass
3/16/23  
Report Pass
3/22/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Engrossed
3/30/23  
Report Pass
3/22/23  
Engrossed
3/30/23  
Refer
5/3/23  
Refer
3/30/23  
Report Pass
6/21/23  
Refer
5/3/23  
Enrolled
9/5/23  
Report Pass
6/21/23  
Chaptered
10/10/23  
Enrolled
9/5/23  
Chaptered
10/10/23  

Caption

Local agencies: airports: customer facility charges.

Impact

The changes instituted by AB 534 will allow airports, particularly the Oakland International Airport, to maintain the customer facility charges for an extended period. By deleting provisions that would have otherwise made these charges inoperative once financing bonds are paid off, the bill ensures that airports can continue to support their rental facilities and related transportation infrastructure. It is expected that this will enhance airport facilities and transportation systems, benefiting both rental companies and passengers.

Summary

Assembly Bill 534, introduced by Assemblymember McCarty, modifies existing regulations regarding customer facility charges at public airports. This bill amends Sections 50474.21 and 50474.3 of the Government Code, primarily affecting the authority of airports to collect fees from rental car companies for specific facility and transportation purposes. Key provisions allow the continuation of these fees beyond the previously set dates and clarify their application in various scenarios where alternative financing methods are not being utilized.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding AB 534 appears to be supportive among airport operators who view the bill as a necessary measure to ensure a steady funding stream for essential infrastructure projects. However, there are concerns from rental car companies about the potential increase in costs, which could be passed onto consumers. The legislation has sparked discussions about the balance between funding needs and consumer protection in the context of airport charges.

Contention

One notable point of contention is the potential burden placed on consumers through these fees. Critics argue that the continued collection of customer facility charges may lead to higher rental costs for customers, especially if fees spike after the maximum allowable amounts are reached. Others express concerns about the transparency of how these funds are managed and spent, calling for more robust oversight mechanisms to ensure accountability and proper use of the collected fees.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB218

Local agencies: airports: customer facility charges.

CA AB1286

Airports: alternative customer facility charges.

CA AB1150

Local agencies: airports: alternative customer facility charges.

CA AB1818

State government.

CA AB2246

Rental passenger vehicles: personal vehicle sharing programs.