California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB638

Introduced
2/9/23  
Refer
2/17/23  
Introduced
2/9/23  
Introduced
2/9/23  
Refer
2/17/23  
Refer
2/17/23  
Report Pass
4/10/23  
Refer
4/11/23  
Report Pass
4/10/23  
Report Pass
4/10/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Refer
4/11/23  
Refer
4/11/23  
Refer
4/24/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Refer
5/3/23  
Refer
4/24/23  
Refer
4/24/23  
Failed
2/1/24  
Refer
5/3/23  
Refer
5/3/23  

Caption

Golden State Teacher Grant Program.

Impact

If enacted, AB 638 would significantly change the conditions under which financial support is granted to teacher candidates. Starting January 1, 2024, new grant recipients will be required to commit to four years of service in a shortage area as labeled by the Commission on Teacher Credentialing. This is a shift from the previous requirement of working solely at priority schools, expanding opportunities for service commitments across various educational settings. The bill also extends the availability of appropriated funds for encumbrance until June 30, 2028, which supports a longer-term financial planning perspective in education funding.

Summary

Assembly Bill 638, also known as the Golden State Teacher Grant Program, seeks to amend existing provisions of the Education Code concerning financial support for students preparing for teaching credentials. The bill is primarily designed to incentivize graduates of professional preparation programs by providing grants to those who commit to teaching in designated shortage areas. These grants, up to $20,000, are intended to bolster the teaching workforce in California's public and private schools.

Sentiment

The sentiment towards AB 638 has been generally supportive, particularly among educational advocates and those concerned with addressing the persistent teacher shortage in California. Stakeholders see the grant program as a proactive measure to support aspiring teachers financially while also emphasizing the importance of teaching in underserved areas. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the long-term viability of such financial commitments and whether the incentives will sufficiently attract and retain educators in challenging teaching environments.

Contention

Some points of contention around the bill include the effectiveness of providing financial incentives as a means to solve the teacher shortage issue. Critics argue that while monetary support is useful, it does not address underlying challenges such as working conditions, class sizes, and administrative support in schools. Additionally, there is concern that the focus on designated shortage areas may overlook the needs of schools that do not qualify for these targeted incentives but still face significant challenges in staffing and resources.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1391

Teachers: preparation and retention data.

CA AB1927

Golden State Teacher Grant Program: career technical education instructors.

CA AB2768

Golden State Teacher Grant Program: nonpublic, nonsectarian schools.

CA AB2845

Migrant education: California Mini-Corps program and currently migratory children.

CA SB1329

Elementary and secondary education: omnibus.

CA AB142

Higher education trailer bill.

CA SB142

Higher education trailer bill.

CA AB320

Teacher preparation programs: regionally accredited institutions.