California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB650

Introduced
2/9/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Introduced
2/9/23  
Introduced
2/9/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Refer
3/27/23  
Report Pass
3/23/23  
Report Pass
4/17/23  
Refer
3/27/23  
Refer
3/27/23  
Refer
4/18/23  
Report Pass
4/17/23  
Report Pass
4/17/23  
Failed
2/1/24  
Refer
4/18/23  
Failed
2/1/24  

Caption

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District: board.

Impact

If enacted, AB 650 is expected to enhance the governance of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District by ensuring that board members possess relevant expertise, particularly in environmental and social justice. The inclusion of representatives from community organizations and a youth perspective is designed to bring a broader range of insights into the district's decision-making processes. These changes will likely bolster community engagement and reflect the needs of a more diverse population in shaping air quality policies.

Summary

Assembly Bill 650, introduced by Assembly Member Arambula, aims to amend Section 40600 of the Health and Safety Code concerning the governance of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District. The bill proposes significant changes to the structure of its board, including extending the terms of city council members and a public member with expertise in health effects related to air pollution from three to four years. Additionally, the bill introduces four new public members to the board, with a focus on diversity and expertise, including one member from a California Native American tribe and a youth member aged 18-26 residing in specific counties within the district.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 650 appears largely positive, reflecting a push towards more inclusive governance that could lead to better representation of underprivileged communities. Proponents of the bill, including local environmental advocacy groups, express hope that the bill would empower marginalized voices, especially in discussions pertinent to air quality and health implications. However, potential critics may be cautious about adding complexity to the governance structure and the implications of longer terms for board members, advocating for a balance between experience and accountability.

Contention

Notably, the bill has provisions that disqualify members who have served more than eight years from future appointments beginning January 1, 2024. This stipulation aims to prevent entrenched leadership within the district's board, fostering new ideas and perspectives over time. Nevertheless, this could also spark debate regarding the balance between stability and change in institutional governance, with some arguing that continuous representation may be essential for sustained effective advocacy, specifically in air quality matters affecting the San Joaquin Valley.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA ACA16

Redistricting: Senate districts.

CA AB157

State government.

CA SB157

Crime prevention: enforcement and training programs.

CA AB1311

California Rangeland, Grazing Land, and Grassland Protection Program.

CA AB1348

Average daily attendance: emergencies: immigration enforcement activity.

CA AB655

California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program.

CA AB1858

California Youth Empowerment Act.

CA SB540

Independent System Operator: independent regional organization: California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program.