State highways: worker safety.
This bill has significant implications for California's Streets and Highways Code. It extends the requirement for the Department of Transportation to provide guidance on using safety measures such as automated flagger assistance devices, buffers, and temporary barriers. By doing so, it seeks to protect workers on public works projects from increased traffic exposure. The department is also required to submit a comprehensive report to the Legislature by January 1, 2024, detailing the effectiveness and recommendations related to these safety measures.
Assembly Bill 752, sponsored by Blanca Rubio, seeks to enhance worker safety on California state highways by amending existing laws related to the use of positive protection measures. Specifically, this bill removes the scheduled repeal date of January 1, 2025, for current provisions, allowing them to continue indefinitely. The legislation mandates that the Department of Transportation must establish and uphold specific standards for safety devices used in construction and maintenance activities within state highway rights-of-way, aimed at safeguarding workers from traffic hazards.
The sentiment around AB 752 appears to be largely positive among proponents, who view it as a vital step towards improving worker safety on state highways. This legislation has garnered support from construction labor groups and safety advocates, who emphasize the importance of effective traffic control measures. However, there may be concerns from some stakeholders regarding the regulatory burdens placed on contractors and the implications for project timelines and costs.
Notably, a point of contention arises regarding the compensation provision for optional safety devices requested by contractors. Contractors are only guaranteed compensation for optional safety devices when explicitly requested for public works projects. This limitation could potentially lead to debates about resource allocation and compliance costs. Additionally, the bill's regulation exemption from the Administrative Procedures Act may raise questions about oversight and stakeholder input in the regulatory process.