California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB786

Introduced
2/13/23  
Refer
2/23/23  
Introduced
2/13/23  
Introduced
2/13/23  
Report Pass
9/12/23  
Refer
2/23/23  
Refer
2/23/23  
Refer
9/13/23  
Report Pass
9/12/23  
Report Pass
9/12/23  
Failed
2/1/24  
Refer
9/13/23  
Refer
9/13/23  

Caption

Restraining orders: filing fees.

Impact

In addition to promoting caregiver support, AB 786 modifies the existing legal framework regarding restraining orders, specifically by prohibiting filing fees for civil harassment petitions from individuals aged 60 and older. This change aims to facilitate greater access to legal protection for older individuals who may be facing harassment or abuse, thereby aligning with the bill's focus on safeguarding the interests of vulnerable populations. The proposed amendments could increase the volume of legal petitions filed by elders and reinforce their rights to seek protection against harassment.

Summary

Assembly Bill 786, introduced by Assembly Member Bains, addresses significant issues related to caregiver support and the legal processes surrounding restraining orders for older adults. The bill establishes the Alzheimer's and Dementia Caregiver Education and Support Grant Program, aiming to provide targeted support to caregivers of persons with dementia. This grant program seeks to improve access to evidence-based education and resources such as respite care, support groups, and counseling, ultimately enhancing the quality of care for individuals suffering from dementia and lightening the burden on caregivers.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 786 is predominantly positive, reflecting a growing concern for the well-being of older adults and their caregivers. Supporters view the bill as a crucial step in addressing the challenges faced by families dealing with dementia and similar conditions. This supportive sentiment highlights an increased recognition of the needs and rights of older adults, particularly in relation to accessing necessary protective measures without financial barriers. However, discussions may indicate some apprehension regarding the bill's implementation and funding sustainability for the grant program.

Contention

Despite its overall favorable reception, discussions around AB 786 may raise concerns regarding the logistics of the grant program's rollout and the adequacy of funding provided by the Legislature. Additionally, while the elimination of filing fees is seen as beneficial, it may lead to an increase in court congestion if more individuals choose to file petitions. Balancing the needs for accessible justice and the capacity of the judicial system could be a notable point of contention in further debates about the bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB925

Protective orders: confidential information regarding minors.

CA AB1143

Civil procedure: restraining orders.

CA SB554

Restraining orders.

CA AB561

Restraining orders.

CA AB611

Safe at Home program: homeowners’ associations.

CA AB953

Protective orders: personal information of minors.

CA AB36

Domestic violence protective orders: possession of a firearm.

CA AB1243

Protective orders: elder and dependent adults.