California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB833

Introduced
2/14/23  
Introduced
2/14/23  
Refer
2/23/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Refer
4/24/23  
Refer
4/24/23  
Refer
5/3/23  
Refer
5/3/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Engrossed
5/30/23  
Refer
5/31/23  
Refer
5/31/23  
Refer
6/7/23  
Refer
6/7/23  
Report Pass
6/19/23  
Report Pass
6/19/23  
Refer
6/19/23  
Refer
6/19/23  
Refer
6/20/23  
Refer
6/20/23  
Refer
6/21/23  

Caption

Freeway caps.

Impact

If enacted, AB 833 would potentially transform how urban spaces are utilized in Los Angeles, specifically by addressing the fragmentation caused by highways. This relocation of focus may lead to better park access for residents, improved community cohesion, and contribute to ecological resilience. Moreover, the plans being drafted by the Department of Transportation for freeway caps aim to facilitate better mobility and bridge existing divides, thus also targeting the economic uplift for disadvantaged areas. This aligns with a larger trend in urban planning towards integration and inclusiveness.

Summary

Assembly Bill 833 aims to expand the Rio de Los Angeles State Park and integrate urban community concerns by capping freeway segments that currently divide underrepresented and disadvantaged neighborhoods. By requiring collaboration among local governments and conservation organizations, the bill promotes holistic urban planning and seeks to enhance park equity within Los Angeles County. The plan to be developed must consider the needs of surrounding communities and will make provisions for public engagement in its formulation, ensuring the voices of urban residents are included.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding AB 833 appears to be positive, with strong support from environmental advocates and urban community leaders. Many view the bill as a progressive step towards rectifying inequities in urban living conditions and accessibility to green spaces. However, there remains concern from some stakeholders about potential funding and implementation challenges, along with skepticism regarding the true breadth of community engagement achievable through the planning process.

Contention

There are notable points of contention regarding the effective allocation of resources and the feasibility of the proposed freeway caps. Critics argue that the costs associated with capping freeways could be substantial, and there may be logistical obstacles in executing such a large-scale project. Additionally, some worry that if local governmental entities do not actively engage with their underserved communities, the outcomes may not reflect the needs and desires of those most affected by these changes. This highlights an ongoing challenge of ensuring equitable involvement in urban planning efforts.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1358

Santa Ana River Conservancy Program: lower Santa Ana River region.

CA SB1126

Upper Los Angeles River and Tributaries Working Group: river ranger program.

CA AB466

Upper Los Angeles River and Tributaries Working Group.

CA AB118

Transportation.

CA SB103

Transportation.

CA AB1500

Safe Drinking Water, Wildfire Prevention, Drought Preparation, Flood Protection, Extreme Heat Mitigation, and Workforce Development Bond Act of 2022.

CA AB1567

Safe Drinking Water, Wildfire Prevention, Drought Preparation, Flood Protection, Extreme Heat Mitigation, Clean Energy, and Workforce Development Bond Act of 2024.

CA SB1015

Natural Resources Climate Resiliency Program.