California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB839

Introduced
2/14/23  
Introduced
2/14/23  
Refer
2/23/23  
Refer
2/23/23  
Report Pass
3/20/23  
Report Pass
3/20/23  
Refer
3/21/23  
Report Pass
3/29/23  
Report Pass
3/29/23  
Refer
4/3/23  
Refer
4/3/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Engrossed
4/27/23  
Refer
4/27/23  
Refer
4/27/23  
Refer
5/10/23  
Refer
5/10/23  
Report Pass
6/7/23  
Refer
6/7/23  
Report Pass
6/20/23  
Report Pass
6/20/23  
Refer
6/20/23  
Refer
6/20/23  
Report Pass
7/5/23  
Refer
7/5/23  
Enrolled
9/7/23  
Enrolled
9/7/23  
Chaptered
10/10/23  
Chaptered
10/10/23  
Passed
10/10/23  

Caption

Residential care facilities for the elderly: financing.

Impact

By modifying the definition of elderly from 62 to 60 years of age, the bill extends the eligibility for services in RCFEs to a wider demographic, potentially increasing the demand for such facilities. Moreover, through the expanded funding mechanisms provided by the California Health Facilities Financing Authority, the bill is positioned to support improvements in the quality of care and accommodation available in RCFEs. This legislative change is crucial as California continues to face challenges in providing adequate healthcare and housing options for its aging population.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 839 aims to amend the Government Code concerning residential care facilities for the elderly (RCFEs). The bill's primary objective is to broaden the scope of the California Health Facilities Financing Authority Act to include RCFEs within the definition of health facilities, allowing these facilities to access funding and financing opportunities previously available only to more traditional health care institutions. This change is expected to enhance the financial support available for the construction, renovation, and expansion of RCFEs, which play a vital role in accommodating the housing and care needs of older residents.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding AB 839 appears to be largely positive, especially among stakeholders in elder care services and advocates for the elderly. Supporters appreciate the increased accessibility to financing, viewing it as a critical step towards improving the quality and availability of care for seniors. However, there may be concerns about ensuring that the additional funds are utilized effectively for the intended purpose and do not lead to inflated costs for residents or neglect in the oversight of care standards.

Contention

Notably, some critics may voice apprehension about the implications of integrating RCFEs into the broader health facilities sector, particularly regarding regulation and oversight. There are concerns that expanding the definition of health facilities could lead to a dilution of standards or create challenges in enforcement. Ensuring that the specific needs of RCFEs are adequately addressed within the existing framework remains a point of contention that stakeholders will need to navigate as the bill is implemented.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB627

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Act.

CA AB2637

Health Facilities Financing Authority Act.

CA AB1026

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Act: California Health Facility Construction Loan Insurance Law.

CA AB2272

Postsecondary education: California Educational Facilities Authority.

CA AB1780

Special hospitals.

MS HB1657

CON; remove health services and all facilities except nursing homes, home health and long-term care hospitals from requirement for.

CA AB1602

Student, faculty, and staff housing: California Student Housing Revolving Loan Fund Act of 2022.

CA AB1377

Student housing plans.