California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB887

Introduced
2/14/23  
Introduced
2/14/23  
Refer
3/16/23  
Refer
3/16/23  
Report Pass
3/16/23  
Report Pass
3/16/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Failed
2/1/24  

Caption

Floating home marinas.

Impact

The passage of AB 887 would formalize and potentially enhance tenant protections within floating home marinas. It mandates that marina management publicly disclose their financial statements along with projections for the next five to ten years, thereby encouraging transparency in how rental funds are managed. The bill aims to ensure that homeowners are not subject to exorbitant rent increases and that they have access to necessary financial information about their housing situation.

Summary

AB 887, introduced by Assembly Member Bonta, aims to amend the Floating Home Residency Law in California, specifically targeting floating home marinas in Alameda, Contra Costa, and Marin counties. The bill provides provisions that restrict the management of these marinas from increasing the rental rates for a floating home tenancy by more than 3% plus the percentage change in the cost of living, or a maximum of 5%, whichever is lower. This regulation is designed to protect homeowners from excessive rental hikes, particularly in a challenging housing market where stability is crucial.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 887 appears to be generally supportive among tenant advocacy groups, who argue that such measures are necessary to protect vulnerable homeowners from fluctuating rents and contribute to housing stability. However, concerns were raised by some marina owners and property management companies, who worry that strict regulations could hinder their ability to manage properties effectively and maintain financial viability.

Contention

Notably, the bill also includes exemptions for floating home berths defined as affordable housing, which may lead to contention regarding what qualifies as affordable. The potential for local ordinances to impose different rental increases is another point of discussion, as this could create a landscape of varying regulations that complicate compliance. Opponents highlight the complexities and possible bureaucratic burdens introduced by such transparency requirements, fearing discouragement of investment in floating marinas.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB252

Floating home marinas: rent caps.

CA AB1035

Mobilehome parks: rent caps.

CA SB1406

Residential care facilities for the elderly: resident services.

CA AB2278

Rent increases: percentage change in the cost of living: Department of Housing and Community Development.

CA AB2778

Mobilehome Affordability Act: mobilehome parks: rent caps.

CA AB978

Mobilehome parks: rent caps.

CA AB1472

City of Imperial Beach: recreational vehicle parks: registration requirements.

CA AB3088

Tenancy: rental payment default: mortgage forbearance: state of emergency: COVID-19.