California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB896

Introduced
2/14/23  
Introduced
2/14/23  
Refer
3/9/23  
Refer
3/9/23  
Report Pass
3/9/23  
Report Pass
3/9/23  
Refer
3/13/23  
Refer
3/13/23  
Report Pass
4/7/23  
Report Pass
4/7/23  
Refer
4/10/23  
Refer
4/10/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Refer
4/19/23  
Refer
5/10/23  
Failed
2/1/24  

Caption

Flood control: City of Woodland: Lower Cache Creek.

Impact

The bill's passage is expected to have a profound impact on local infrastructure, assuring compliance with urban flood protection standards and significantly mitigating flood-related hazards for the residents of Woodland. Additionally, it supports local economic stability by protecting the essential industrial area along the floodplain, which is integral to the region's food and agricultural economy. This project is poised to bring ecological benefits and preserve vital state assets while addressing the unique vulnerability faced by economically disadvantaged communities within the floodplain.

Summary

Assembly Bill 896, introduced by Assembly Member Aguiar-Curry, aims to enhance flood control measures for the City of Woodland, located in Yolo County, through the approval of the Lower Cache Creek Flood Risk Management Project. The bill allows for significant state funding, up to 99% of project costs, which totals approximately $128 million, to be allocated for the planning, engineering, design, and mitigation efforts required to manage flood risks effectively. This legislative action reflects an urgent response to the identified flood risks in the area, which have been recognized through various studies and assessments conducted with the assistance of the United States Army Corps of Engineers and other state agencies.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 896 appears to be largely positive among local officials and community stakeholders who recognize the necessity of improved flood management, particularly in light of historical flooding challenges. Nonetheless, there are concerns related to Measure S, a local initiative that requires voter approval for flood control projects, which might complicate the implementation of the bill. The prospect of state funding is seen as a welcome support mechanism amidst apprehensions regarding past flood incidents and ongoing legal considerations associated with local governance and funding structures.

Contention

Notably, the bill maintains that Measure S will not be affected, meaning the voters' rights to have a say in substantial flood control funding remains intact despite the expected state investment. This aspect creates a dual focus in the discussions—advancing flood control measures while recognizing the community's established legal frameworks. As the bill moves forward, it will navigate the intersection of legislative authority, local governance, and community engagement, underscoring the complexities inherent in managing state and local resources to address urgent environmental challenges.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2450

Flood control: City of Woodland: Lower Cache Creek.

CA AB1255

Fire prevention: fire risk reduction guidance: local assistance grants.

CA SB1404

California Environmental Quality Act: oak woodlands.

CA SB462

Community colleges: Urban and Rural Forest and Woodlands Restoration and Fire Resiliency Workforce Program.

CA AB720

California Rangeland, Grazing Land, and Grassland Protection Program: grants for local programs.

CA AB1197

Agricultural Protection Planning Grant Program: local food producers.

CT SB00388

An Act Concerning Connecticut's Economic And Environmental Future.

CA AB1089

Western Joshua Tree Conservation Act: industrial projects and commercial projects.