California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB950

Introduced
2/14/23  
Introduced
2/14/23  
Refer
3/2/23  
Refer
3/2/23  
Report Pass
4/18/23  
Report Pass
4/18/23  
Refer
4/19/23  
Refer
4/19/23  
Report Pass
4/25/23  
Report Pass
4/25/23  
Refer
4/27/23  
Refer
4/27/23  
Refer
5/10/23  
Refer
5/10/23  
Failed
2/1/24  

Caption

Accessibility: internet websites.

Impact

If enacted, AB 950 would mandate that entities ensure their websites are accessible, enhancing the rights of disabled individuals to access online resources. The legislation also imposes new responsibilities on resource service providers tasked with constructing or maintaining internet websites to comply with these accessibility standards. Compliance with such standards is intended to facilitate better communication and enjoyment of services for disabled users, aligning with broader disability rights goals established under both state and federal law.

Summary

Assembly Bill 950, introduced by Assembly Member Maienschein, amends existing laws related to the accessibility of internet websites for individuals with disabilities. The bill specifies conditions under which statutory damages can be recovered for website inaccessibility, requiring plaintiffs to demonstrate personal encounters with barriers or deterrence from accessing the websites. This legislative effort aims to ensure that all Californians, regardless of disability status, can effectively communicate and engage with web services. The bill also focuses on establishing compliance with internet website accessibility standards, specifically referencing the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG).

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding AB 950 appears supportive among disability advocacy groups who view enhanced website accessibility as a critical issue. Proponents argue that the bill is a significant step towards fostering inclusivity and ensuring equal access to digital platforms. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the potential for increased litigation and the burden it may impose on businesses, particularly small businesses, which might face challenges in adapting to these new accessibility requirements.

Contention

One point of contention involves the specifics of how damages are determined and the evidence required for plaintiffs to succeed in their claims. Critics argue that the requirements for proving personal encounters with barriers could create obstacles for individuals who face discrimination but not always in a quantifiable manner. Additionally, there is concern about how these new standards may affect the web development industry, specifically regarding the ability of smaller companies to comply without incurring substantial costs.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2123

Accessibility: internet website.

CA AB1757

Accessibility: internet websites.

CA AB2962

Court records: fees.

CA SB1486

Accessibility: internet websites.

CA AB2917

Disability access: internet websites, parking lots, and exterior paths of travel.

CA AB3002

Disability access requirements: information.

CA AB1404

Disability access: internet website-related accessibility claims.

CA AB780

Disability access: construction-related accessibility claims: notice of violation and opportunity to correct.