California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB953

Introduced
2/14/23  
Refer
3/2/23  
Refer
3/2/23  
Report Pass
3/16/23  
Report Pass
3/16/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Report Pass
3/28/23  
Report Pass
3/28/23  
Refer
3/30/23  
Refer
3/30/23  
Report Pass
4/18/23  
Report Pass
4/18/23  
Refer
4/20/23  
Refer
5/3/23  
Refer
5/3/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Engrossed
5/30/23  
Engrossed
5/30/23  
Refer
5/31/23  
Refer
6/7/23  
Refer
6/7/23  
Report Pass
7/12/23  
Report Pass
7/12/23  
Refer
7/13/23  
Refer
7/13/23  

Caption

Coastal resources: voluntary vessel speed reduction and sustainable shipping program.

Impact

If enacted, AB 953 would significantly impact existing state laws related to marine environmental protection. By formalizing a program that incentivizes slower vessel speeds, the bill seeks to enhance both public health and marine ecosystem safety through reductions in nitrogen oxide emissions and the risk of whale strikes. The program is limited to vessels of 300 gross tons or greater, indicating a targeted approach toward larger, potentially more harmful shipping activities along the coast. This could also enhance regulations around commercial maritime operations, providing a structured framework for environmental stewardship within California's coastal waters.

Summary

Assembly Bill 953 aims to implement a statewide voluntary vessel speed reduction and sustainable shipping program along the California coast. The bill mandates the Ocean Protection Council to work in coordination with relevant agencies, including the State Air Resources Board and various air pollution control districts, to reduce air pollution, mitigate the risk of fatal vessel strikes on whales, and lessen harmful underwater noise pollution. The program is designed to expand upon the existing Protecting Blue Whales and Blue Skies Program, which has demonstrated its effectiveness at reducing pollution and protecting marine life.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding AB 953 appears to be one of optimism balanced with caution. Proponents of the bill, which includes a coalition of environmental groups and legislators, argue that it builds on a successful model that has proven effective at reducing environmental hazards. However, there may also be concerns from shipping industry stakeholders about compliance costs associated with new regulations and the feasibility of enforcing speed limits for larger vessels in diverse maritime environments.

Contention

While the focus of AB 953 is on environmental protection, there are potential points of contention. Economic arguments may arise regarding the implications for business operations, and the logistics of implementing speed zones could be debated among maritime stakeholders. Furthermore, the bill raises questions about voluntary vs. mandatory compliance—how will shipping companies be encouraged or incentivized to participate, and what enforcement mechanisms will be in place to ensure compliance with the new program?

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2298

Coastal resources: Protecting Blue Whales and Blue Skies Program.

CA AB14

Coastal resources: Protecting Blue Whales and Blue Skies Program.

CA SB69

Ocean Resiliency Act of 2019.

CA AB2257

State lands: oil and gas leases: cost study.