California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB972

Introduced
2/14/23  
Introduced
2/14/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Report Pass
3/23/23  
Report Pass
3/23/23  
Refer
3/27/23  
Refer
3/27/23  
Report Pass
4/27/23  
Refer
4/27/23  
Refer
5/17/23  
Refer
5/17/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Engrossed
5/30/23  
Engrossed
5/30/23  
Refer
5/31/23  
Refer
5/31/23  
Refer
6/7/23  
Refer
6/7/23  
Report Pass
6/28/23  
Report Pass
6/28/23  
Refer
6/29/23  
Refer
6/29/23  
Refer
7/10/23  

Caption

Local Assistance and Grant Program Streamlining Workgroup.

Impact

The bill is designed to have a significant impact on state funding laws as it aims to streamline the processes that local municipalities face when applying for state funding. Local governments, often lacking sufficient resources and expertise, have struggled with fragmented grant systems. By providing a structured approach to assistance and prioritizing the unique needs of disadvantaged communities, AB 972 seeks to advance equity in the distribution of funds and broaden access to grant programs critical for local development and implementation.

Summary

Assembly Bill 972, introduced by Assembly Member Maienschein, seeks to establish a Local Assistance and Grant Program Streamlining Workgroup within the Office of Planning and Research. This initiative aims to centralize local assistance and develop a coordinated system for managing state and federal funding, ensuring that resources are distributed efficiently and effectively. Anticipated to be convened by January 1, 2025, the workgroup will address the fragmented nature of existing funding opportunities and work towards a more unified approach to local assistance, with a report outlining their findings and recommendations due by June 30, 2026.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 972 is generally positive among supporters who see it as a necessary step to improve local government capacity and efficiency. Proponents argue that the bill will enhance collaboration between state and local governments, thereby making it easier for communities to compete for funding. Conversely, there are concerns about the effectiveness of a centralized system and whether it might overlook localized needs and conditions, though these points have not overshadowed the support for the bill.

Contention

One notable point of contention stems from the balance of power between state authority and local autonomy. Critics worry that while streamlining processes is beneficial, there is a risk that local needs and context might not be adequately represented in a centralized system. Furthermore, the bill specifies that implementation of recommendations from the workgroup is contingent on legislative appropriation, which could delay or complicate the proposed improvements. The requirement for funding underscores ongoing discussions about financial resources available to local governments and the sustainability of proposed changes.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB228

Master Plan on Aging.

CA AB2501

Before and after school programs: California Universal Afterschool Program Workgroup.

CA AB686

California Community-Based Behavioral Health Outcomes and Accountability Review.

CA SB970

Mental Health Services Act.

CA AB642

Wildfires.

CA AB890

Nonminor dependents: county of residence.

CA AB2982

Prenatal-to-3 working group.

CA AB1352

Governing boards of school districts: censure or removal of members.