California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AR6 Latest Draft

Bill / Introduced Version Filed 01/10/2023

                            CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20232024 REGULAR SESSION House Resolution No. 6Introduced by Assembly Member Aguiar-Curry(Coauthors: Assembly Members Bauer-Kahan, Boerner Horvath, Bonta, Calderon, Wendy Carrillo, Cervantes, Friedman, McKinnor, Stephanie Nguyen, Ortega, Pacheco, Papan, Pellerin, Petrie-Norris, Quirk-Silva, Reyes, Luz Rivas, Blanca Rubio, Schiavo, Soria, Weber, Wicks, and Wilson)January 10, 2023 Relative to reproductive health. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTHR 6, as introduced, Aguiar-Curry. Digest KeyBill TextWHEREAS, January 22, 2023, marks the 50th anniversary of the United States Supreme Courts landmark decision in Roe v. Wade (1973) 410 U.S. 113, which affirmed the fundamental right to control reproductive decisions and decide whether to continue a pregnancy or obtain an abortion, which is an occasion deserving of acknowledgment; andWHEREAS, Roe v. Wade was overturned by a 6-3 vote of the United States Supreme Court in Dobbs v. Jackson Womens Health Organization (2022) 597 U.S. ____ on June 24, 2022; andWHEREAS, Roe v. Wade had been the cornerstone of ones ability to control their reproductive lives, affirming the right of anyone who could become pregnant in the United States to decide when and if to have children; andWHEREAS, Abortion is a safe and common medical procedure and nearly one in four women in the United States will have an abortion by 45 years of age; andWHEREAS, The Turnaway Study shows that denying people abortion creates economic hardship and insecurity that lasts for years and negatively impacts those people and their children; andWHEREAS, Maternal death rates are 62 percent higher and perinatal death rates are 15 percent higher in states where abortion is restricted than in states with access to abortion and abortion bans disproportionately harm youth, people with low incomes, and communities of color; andWHEREAS, As a result of the Dobbs decision repealing Roe v. Wade, 13 states have total abortion bans in effect and almost one-third of women and people who can become pregnant of reproductive age in the United States live in a state where abortion is not legal or is severely restricted; andWHEREAS, With Roe v. Wade overturned, it is likely that abortion will be banned or severely restricted in 26 states, affecting more than 36 million women and even more people who can become pregnant; andWHEREAS, Without the protections under Roe, there are no federal protections for patients and providers of sexual and reproductive health care from being criminalized for receiving or providing essential health care services; andWHEREAS, The State of California stands in strong support of every individuals fundamental right to choose whether to continue a pregnancy; andWHEREAS, Four years before Roe v. Wade, our state Supreme Court held that Californians have the fundamental constitutional right to procreative choice, a right that follows our states recognition of the right to privacy in matters relating to marriage, family, and sex, in People v. Belous (1969) 71 Cal. 2d 954; andWHEREAS, Our state Supreme Court recognized that while, at the time, there was no enumerated privacy right in either our or federal Constitution, the right to privacy was indisputably a fundamental right; andWHEREAS, To further lay the groundwork to protect that right, California voters, in 1972, one year before Roe v. Wade, passed a constitutional amendment to explicitly provide for the constitutional right to privacy; andWHEREAS, In the immediate aftermath of the United States Supreme Courts devastating decision in Dobbs v. Jackson, the Legislature passed and the Governor signed a comprehensive package of legislation expanding, protecting, and strengthening access to reproductive health care, including abortions for all Californians and people seeking such care, in our state; andWHEREAS, The Legislature passed Senate Constitutional Amendment 10 to put Proposition 1 on the November 2022 ballot; andWHEREAS, The California voters overwhelmingly supported Proposition 1, and enacted a state constitutional right to prohibit the state from interfering with an individuals reproductive freedom in their most intimate decisions, which includes their fundamental right to choose to have an abortion and their fundamental right to choose or refuse contraceptives; now, therefore, be itResolved by the Assembly of the State of California, That the Assembly urges the President of the United States and the United States Congress to enact federal legislation that guarantees the right to reproductive freedom, including abortion and contraception; and be it furtherResolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies of this resolution to the President and Vice President of the United States, to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, to the Majority Leader of the Senate, to each Senator and Representative from California in the Congress of the United States, and to the author for appropriate distribution.

 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20232024 REGULAR SESSION House Resolution No. 6Introduced by Assembly Member Aguiar-Curry(Coauthors: Assembly Members Bauer-Kahan, Boerner Horvath, Bonta, Calderon, Wendy Carrillo, Cervantes, Friedman, McKinnor, Stephanie Nguyen, Ortega, Pacheco, Papan, Pellerin, Petrie-Norris, Quirk-Silva, Reyes, Luz Rivas, Blanca Rubio, Schiavo, Soria, Weber, Wicks, and Wilson)January 10, 2023 Relative to reproductive health. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTHR 6, as introduced, Aguiar-Curry. Digest Key





 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20232024 REGULAR SESSION

 House Resolution 

No. 6

Introduced by Assembly Member Aguiar-Curry(Coauthors: Assembly Members Bauer-Kahan, Boerner Horvath, Bonta, Calderon, Wendy Carrillo, Cervantes, Friedman, McKinnor, Stephanie Nguyen, Ortega, Pacheco, Papan, Pellerin, Petrie-Norris, Quirk-Silva, Reyes, Luz Rivas, Blanca Rubio, Schiavo, Soria, Weber, Wicks, and Wilson)January 10, 2023

Introduced by Assembly Member Aguiar-Curry(Coauthors: Assembly Members Bauer-Kahan, Boerner Horvath, Bonta, Calderon, Wendy Carrillo, Cervantes, Friedman, McKinnor, Stephanie Nguyen, Ortega, Pacheco, Papan, Pellerin, Petrie-Norris, Quirk-Silva, Reyes, Luz Rivas, Blanca Rubio, Schiavo, Soria, Weber, Wicks, and Wilson)
January 10, 2023

 Relative to reproductive health. 

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST

## LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST

HR 6, as introduced, Aguiar-Curry. 



## Digest Key

## Bill Text

WHEREAS, January 22, 2023, marks the 50th anniversary of the United States Supreme Courts landmark decision in Roe v. Wade (1973) 410 U.S. 113, which affirmed the fundamental right to control reproductive decisions and decide whether to continue a pregnancy or obtain an abortion, which is an occasion deserving of acknowledgment; and

WHEREAS, Roe v. Wade was overturned by a 6-3 vote of the United States Supreme Court in Dobbs v. Jackson Womens Health Organization (2022) 597 U.S. ____ on June 24, 2022; and

WHEREAS, Roe v. Wade had been the cornerstone of ones ability to control their reproductive lives, affirming the right of anyone who could become pregnant in the United States to decide when and if to have children; and

WHEREAS, Abortion is a safe and common medical procedure and nearly one in four women in the United States will have an abortion by 45 years of age; and

WHEREAS, The Turnaway Study shows that denying people abortion creates economic hardship and insecurity that lasts for years and negatively impacts those people and their children; and

WHEREAS, Maternal death rates are 62 percent higher and perinatal death rates are 15 percent higher in states where abortion is restricted than in states with access to abortion and abortion bans disproportionately harm youth, people with low incomes, and communities of color; and

WHEREAS, As a result of the Dobbs decision repealing Roe v. Wade, 13 states have total abortion bans in effect and almost one-third of women and people who can become pregnant of reproductive age in the United States live in a state where abortion is not legal or is severely restricted; and

WHEREAS, With Roe v. Wade overturned, it is likely that abortion will be banned or severely restricted in 26 states, affecting more than 36 million women and even more people who can become pregnant; and

WHEREAS, Without the protections under Roe, there are no federal protections for patients and providers of sexual and reproductive health care from being criminalized for receiving or providing essential health care services; and

WHEREAS, The State of California stands in strong support of every individuals fundamental right to choose whether to continue a pregnancy; and

WHEREAS, Four years before Roe v. Wade, our state Supreme Court held that Californians have the fundamental constitutional right to procreative choice, a right that follows our states recognition of the right to privacy in matters relating to marriage, family, and sex, in People v. Belous (1969) 71 Cal. 2d 954; and

WHEREAS, Our state Supreme Court recognized that while, at the time, there was no enumerated privacy right in either our or federal Constitution, the right to privacy was indisputably a fundamental right; and

WHEREAS, To further lay the groundwork to protect that right, California voters, in 1972, one year before Roe v. Wade, passed a constitutional amendment to explicitly provide for the constitutional right to privacy; and

WHEREAS, In the immediate aftermath of the United States Supreme Courts devastating decision in Dobbs v. Jackson, the Legislature passed and the Governor signed a comprehensive package of legislation expanding, protecting, and strengthening access to reproductive health care, including abortions for all Californians and people seeking such care, in our state; and

WHEREAS, The Legislature passed Senate Constitutional Amendment 10 to put Proposition 1 on the November 2022 ballot; and

WHEREAS, The California voters overwhelmingly supported Proposition 1, and enacted a state constitutional right to prohibit the state from interfering with an individuals reproductive freedom in their most intimate decisions, which includes their fundamental right to choose to have an abortion and their fundamental right to choose or refuse contraceptives; now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Assembly of the State of California, That the Assembly urges the President of the United States and the United States Congress to enact federal legislation that guarantees the right to reproductive freedom, including abortion and contraception; and be it further

Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies of this resolution to the President and Vice President of the United States, to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, to the Majority Leader of the Senate, to each Senator and Representative from California in the Congress of the United States, and to the author for appropriate distribution.