California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB1000

Introduced
2/1/24  
Introduced
2/1/24  
Refer
2/14/24  
Refer
2/14/24  
Refer
3/13/24  
Refer
3/13/24  
Refer
3/20/24  
Refer
3/20/24  
Report Pass
4/24/24  
Report Pass
4/24/24  
Refer
4/25/24  
Refer
4/25/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Engrossed
5/24/24  
Engrossed
5/24/24  
Refer
6/3/24  
Refer
6/3/24  
Report Pass
6/19/24  
Report Pass
6/19/24  
Refer
6/20/24  
Refer
6/20/24  
Refer
6/24/24  
Refer
6/24/24  
Report Pass
7/2/24  
Report Pass
7/2/24  

Caption

Connected devices: device protection requests.

Impact

Set to take effect on January 1, 2026, SB 1000 will compel manufacturers and account managers of connected devices to create systems that prioritize user security and privacy. The bill requires specific procedural implementations, including ensuring survivors can manage notifications regarding device access. By mandating quick response times to device protection requests, the legislation aims to minimize risks associated with abusive behaviors facilitated by technology. It also emphasizes confidentiality, with strict guidelines for disposing of information related to survivors' protection requests, thereby mitigating concerns over data breaches or unauthorized disclosures.

Summary

Senate Bill 1000, introduced by Senators Ashby and Rubio, is aimed at enhancing protections for individuals using connected devices in situations of domestic abuse. The bill mandates that an account manager must deny access to a connected device within two days if a device protection request is submitted by a person claiming to be a survivor of abuse. This is designed to prevent abusers from accessing devices that could facilitate harassment or intimidation. The bill also establishes processes for survivors to assert their requests, ensuring they can provide necessary documentation and that their information remains confidential in handling by account managers.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 1000 appears largely positive among advocates for domestic abuse survivors, as it addresses significant gaps in existing laws regarding technology and personal safety. Supporters see it as a proactive step towards ameliorating the safety concerns faced by victims and are optimistic about its contributions to mitigating coercive control through digital means. However, there are concerns about the bill’s implementation logistics and whether account managers will be sufficiently equipped to handle these requests promptly and effectively.

Contention

Notably, one point of contention articulated during discussions revolves around the increase in legal obligations for account managers and potential challenges in compliance and enforcement. Critics may argue that such regulations could impose additional burdens on manufacturers and service providers, complicating operational capabilities and potentially leading to higher costs for consumers. Additionally, the bill imposes civil penalties for non-compliance, which raises questions about accountability mechanisms and their effect on small businesses or startups in the connected device market.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB50

Connected devices: device protection requests.

CA AB3139

Data privacy: vehicle manufacturers: remote vehicle technology.

CA SB1394

Access to connected vehicle service.

CA SB738

The Reclaim Act.

WI SB1033

Suspending remote access to motor vehicles upon request from survivors of domestic abuse, human trafficking, and related acts.

WI AB1135

Suspending remote access to motor vehicles upon request from survivors of domestic abuse, human trafficking, and related acts.

VT H0223

An act relating to stalking through the use of tracking technology

CT SB01356

An Act Concerning Data Privacy, Online Monitoring, Social Media, Data Brokers And Connected Vehicle Services.