The enactment of SB 1328 will have significant implications for state laws regarding elections. It mandates the retention of specific election materials, including paper cast vote records and electronic data, for a minimum of 22 months in federal elections or 6 months for others, thereby expanding the duties of county elections officials. This change aligns with the bill's goal to bolster election security while making sure that vital data remains accessible for longer periods, which is particularly important for audits or recounts.
Senate Bill 1328, authored by Senator Bradford, amends several sections of the Elections Code to enhance the security and integrity of election processes in California. The bill establishes new requirements for electronic voting systems, including electronic poll books and ballot on demand systems, ensuring they receive approval from the Secretary of State before usage in elections. Additionally, it introduces stricter notification protocols for vendors regarding defects in voting systems, reducing the notification window from two business days to 24 hours, thus ensuring prompt action and increasing accountability.
The sentiment surrounding SB 1328 appears to be largely supportive among those prioritizing election integrity and security. Proponents argue that the enhanced measures will protect voter data and strengthen trust in the electoral process. However, there are concerns voiced by some local officials about the increased responsibilities this bill imposes and the associated financial implications that may arise in implementing these requirements without adequate state reimbursement.
Notably, one point of contention in the discussions was the bill's provision that no reimbursement is required for certain mandated costs incurred by local agencies and school districts related to the new conditions set forth in the bill. Critics argue that this could place an undue financial burden on local jurisdictions tasked with implementing the new standards, particularly in a constrained budget environment. Furthermore, the expansion of certain criminal definitions related to the tampering with voting systems has also sparked debate regarding its enforceability and the implications for civil liberties.