Water quality: state board certification.
The bill is poised to impact state laws significantly by expediting the water quality certification process, thereby potentially accelerating the development of clean energy projects. Proponents argue that by introducing these amendments, California can meet federal requirements for water quality assessments more efficiently, which is essential for leveraging federal tax credits and incentives under the recently passed Inflation Reduction Act. In doing so, SB1360 aligns state and federal interests in promoting cleaner and more renewable energy sources.
Senate Bill 1360, introduced by Senator Alvarado-Gil, aims to amend existing provisions of the California Water Code regarding water rights and the state's water quality certification process. One of the key elements of SB1360 is its requirement for the State Water Resources Control Board to issue water quality certification before the completion of the environmental review process, contingent upon a joint determination by the state board and the Governor's Office that the project will aid in achieving California's clean energy goals. This initiative is expected to streamline the regulatory process for projects that are aligned with clean energy objectives and enhance the state's electric reliability.
General sentiment surrounding SB1360 appears to be supportive among advocates of clean energy, who view it as a necessary measure to facilitate environmental responsibility and energy independence. However, there may also be concerns regarding the environmental watchdogs' ability to monitor projects adequately without the usual environmental review processes preceding approvals. This dual perspective indicates an ongoing tension between the need for swift energy solutions and environmental protection.
Notably, contention may arise over the expedited process outlined in SB1360, particularly among environmental advocates who may feel that the requirements for thorough reviews of projects could be undermined. Opponents of the bill could argue that reducing the preparatory requirements for water quality certifications might lead to unchecked environmental impacts, thereby compromising water quality standards that the state aims to uphold.