California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB238

Introduced
1/24/23  
Refer
2/1/23  
Introduced
1/24/23  
Introduced
1/24/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Refer
2/1/23  
Refer
2/1/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Report Pass
4/13/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Refer
4/17/23  
Report Pass
4/13/23  
Report Pass
4/13/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Refer
4/17/23  
Refer
4/17/23  
Engrossed
5/24/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Engrossed
5/24/23  
Refer
6/1/23  
Refer
6/1/23  
Refer
6/1/23  
Refer
6/19/23  
Refer
6/19/23  
Report Pass
6/28/23  
Refer
6/19/23  
Report Pass
6/28/23  
Refer
6/28/23  

Caption

Health care coverage: independent medical review.

Impact

Set to take effect on July 1, 2024, the bill addresses significant gaps in the availability of timely medical reviews for young enrollees whose care is denied or altered based on medical necessity. Currently, appeals must be initiated by the insured; this bill shifts the burden onto providers to ensure disputes are reviewed promptly. Its aim is to reduce barriers that youth face in accessing necessary healthcare services in California, particularly in light of growing mental health issues within this demographic.

Summary

Senate Bill 238, introduced by Senator Wiener, aims to improve access to mental health and substance use disorder services for youth in California. The bill modifies the existing Independent Medical Review System, requiring healthcare providers and disability insurers to submit decisions regarding the denial, modification, or delay of certain health services automatically within 24 hours. This requirement specifically pertains to services affecting individuals up to 26 years old, particularly focusing on mental health and substance use disorder conditions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 238 appears largely positive among proponents who advocate for enhanced healthcare access and quicker resolutions for medical disputes. Supporters emphasize the need for reforms that consider the unique vulnerabilities of young patients, particularly in mental health contexts. Critics may express concerns about the implications for insurers and the potential administrative burden introduced by these new requirements.

Contention

Notable points of contention may center on the implications of imposing such rapid reporting requirements on healthcare providers and insurers, particularly regarding the handling of sensitive medical data. Some stakeholders might argue that while the aims of the bill are commendable, the operational challenges and costs associated with compliance could deter smaller insurers or providers from fully participating. Additionally, the exclusion of Medi-Cal managed care plans from its provisions raises questions about equity in health care access across different insurance programs.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB294

Health care coverage: independent medical review.

CA SB999

Health coverage: mental health and substance use disorders.

CA SB855

Health coverage: mental health or substance use disorders.

CA SB1320

Mental health and substance use disorder treatment.

CA AB1355

Public social services: hearings.

CA AB2100

Medi-Cal: pharmacy benefits.

CT HB06557

An Act Implementing The Recommendations Of The Legislative Program Review And Investigations Committee Concerning The Health Carrier Utilization Review And Grievance Process.