California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB390

Introduced
2/9/23  
Refer
2/22/23  
Introduced
2/9/23  
Refer
2/22/23  
Refer
3/16/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Refer
3/16/23  
Refer
4/10/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Refer
4/10/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Refer
4/19/23  
Report Pass
4/26/23  
Report Pass
4/26/23  
Engrossed
5/22/23  
Refer
4/26/23  
Refer
5/26/23  
Engrossed
5/22/23  
Report Pass
6/20/23  
Refer
5/26/23  
Refer
5/26/23  
Report Pass
6/20/23  
Report Pass
7/6/23  
Refer
6/20/23  
Refer
6/20/23  
Report Pass
7/6/23  
Report Pass
9/1/23  
Refer
7/6/23  
Refer
7/6/23  
Enrolled
9/13/23  
Report Pass
9/1/23  
Report Pass
9/1/23  
Vetoed
10/7/23  
Enrolled
9/13/23  

Caption

Voluntary carbon offsets: business regulation.

Impact

If enacted, SB 390 will significantly impact state laws concerning environmental marketing and business regulations surrounding carbon offsets. The bill implements stricter conditions for entities involved in the creation and sale of carbon offsets, ensuring they adhere to measures that confirm their effectiveness in reducing greenhouse gases. Although violations of the bill will not constitute a criminal offense, they will be subject to relevant civil remedies, potentially leading to increased scrutiny and oversight in the carbon offset market.

Summary

Senate Bill 390, introduced by Senator Limn, addresses the regulation of voluntary carbon offsets in California. The bill seeks to ensure the integrity of carbon offset projects by establishing that it is unlawful to certify or market offsets if the greenhouse gas reductions associated with these projects are not quantifiable, real, or additional. This legislation aims to prevent consumer deception and enhance the reliability of carbon markets, thereby encouraging genuine environmental benefits through carbon offsetting activities.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding SB 390 is generally supportive from environmental advocates and regulatory bodies who view it as a necessary step in promoting environmental integrity and accountability. However, there is also anxiety from businesses that participate in carbon offsetting, as they may perceive heightened compliance costs and operational burdens. The debate underscores a broader discussion about balancing environmental objectives with economic considerations, leading to a polarized sentiment among stakeholders.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the definitions and criteria set forth in the bill, particularly related to the terms 'quantifiable', 'real', and 'additional'. Critics concern that the stringent requirements might inhibit the development of new carbon offset projects or unfavorably impact smaller entities unable to meet the bill's prerequisites. Tensions may rise as the bill necessitates businesses to navigate complex regulatory landscapes while aiming to contribute positively to climate mitigation efforts.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1036

Voluntary carbon offsets: business regulation.

CA AB1305

Voluntary carbon market disclosures.

CA AB2331

Voluntary carbon market disclosures.

CA AB1395

The California Climate Crisis Act.

OH SB174

Allow retail natural gas service supplier to offer carbon offsets

CA SB308

Net zero greenhouse gas emissions goal: carbon dioxide removal: regulations.