California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB477

Introduced
2/14/23  
Introduced
2/14/23  
Refer
2/22/23  
Refer
2/22/23  
Report Pass
5/2/23  
Report Pass
5/2/23  
Engrossed
5/8/23  
Engrossed
5/8/23  
Refer
5/18/23  
Refer
5/18/23  
Report Pass
6/21/23  
Report Pass
6/21/23  
Enrolled
7/10/23  
Enrolled
3/14/24  
Enrolled
3/14/24  
Chaptered
3/25/24  
Chaptered
3/25/24  

Caption

Accessory dwelling units.

Impact

The bill introduces essential changes that void any local restrictions likely to inhibit the construction of ADUs and JADUs on single-family residential lots that comply with state standards. Specifically, it aims to eliminate unreasonable covenants or restrictions present in deeds or other sales contracts that could impede the development of these units. By decreasing bureaucratic hurdles and clarifying regulations, SB 477 is expected to encourage the construction of more affordable housing options across California.

Summary

Senate Bill 477, proposed by the Committee on Housing, primarily addresses the regulation and creation of accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and junior accessory dwelling units (JADUs) in the state of California. The legislation seeks to amend existing laws pertaining to these units, streamlining the regulations for their approval while ensuring that such local ordinances align with state standards. This bill is characterized as an urgency statute, which allows it to take effect immediately, emphasizing its importance in addressing the state's ongoing housing crisis.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 477 appears generally favorable among housing advocates and developers, who see it as a necessary measure to alleviate the housing shortage in California. Proponents argue that the legislation will not only enhance housing availability but also support local economies by fostering diverse living opportunities. Nonetheless, concerns have been raised by some community members who fear that such measures might lead to increased density in residential areas and challenge the character of neighborhoods.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention involves the balance between state mandates and local control over land use policies. Opponents of the legislation worry that it may centralize regulatory authority, undermining the ability of local governments to make decisions that reflect the unique needs of their communities. This debate reflects broader concerns about the tension between state-level housing initiatives aimed at addressing shortages and the preservation of local governance and community identity.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1030

Housing.

CA AB500

Local planning: coastal development: streamlined permitting.

CA AB671

Accessory dwelling units: incentives.

CA AB1063

Planning and Zoning Law: housing elements: accessory dwelling units: adequate site substitutes.

CA AB725

General plans: housing element: moderate-income and above moderate-income housing: suburban and metropolitan jurisdictions.

CA AB1304

Affirmatively further fair housing: housing element: inventory of land.

CA AB906

Planning and zoning: housing elements: affirmatively furthering fair housing.

CA AB1398

Planning and zoning: housing element: rezoning of sites: prohousing local policies.