California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB54

Introduced
12/6/22  
Refer
1/18/23  
Introduced
12/6/22  
Introduced
12/6/22  
Refer
3/16/23  
Refer
1/18/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Refer
3/16/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Refer
4/10/23  
Refer
4/10/23  
Refer
4/11/23  
Refer
4/11/23  
Refer
4/11/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Refer
4/17/23  
Refer
4/17/23  
Refer
4/17/23  
Report Pass
4/20/23  
Report Pass
4/20/23  
Report Pass
4/26/23  
Refer
4/20/23  
Refer
4/20/23  
Refer
4/27/23  
Report Pass
4/26/23  
Report Pass
4/26/23  
Refer
4/27/23  
Refer
4/27/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Engrossed
5/25/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Refer
6/8/23  
Engrossed
5/25/23  
Engrossed
5/25/23  
Refer
6/8/23  
Report Pass
6/27/23  
Refer
6/8/23  
Report Pass
6/27/23  
Refer
6/28/23  
Refer
6/28/23  
Refer
6/28/23  
Report Pass
7/6/23  
Report Pass
7/6/23  
Refer
7/10/23  
Report Pass
9/1/23  
Refer
7/10/23  
Refer
7/10/23  
Report Pass
9/1/23  
Enrolled
9/7/23  
Enrolled
9/7/23  
Chaptered
10/8/23  
Chaptered
10/8/23  
Passed
10/8/23  

Caption

Venture capital companies: reporting.

Impact

The legislation aims to promote fair investment practices by ensuring that venture capital firms actively track and report the diversity of the teams they fund. This move is designed to encourage inclusivity and equity in venture capital funding, which is often critiqued for favoring a homogenous group of founders. By mandating such reporting, the bill seeks to address systemic biases in funding that may affect minority and diverse entrepreneurs, ultimately promoting equal access to capital.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 54, also known as the Venture Capital Companies Reporting Bill, requires venture capital companies in California to report information regarding their funding decisions starting March 1, 2025. Specifically, the bill mandates these companies to provide aggregated data about the demographic composition of founding teams for businesses they invest in, emphasizing the identification of diverse founding team members. The goal is to improve transparency regarding investment practices and ensure accountability in funding decisions that may disproportionately exclude underrepresented groups.

Sentiment

Overall, the reception to SB54 has been mixed. Supporters laud the bill for its potential to drive greater inclusivity in the venture capital space, which could benefit a wider range of entrepreneurs from various backgrounds. However, some critics express concerns about the administrative burden this legislation may impose on venture capital firms. There are also discussions about the efficacy of merely reporting data versus implementing substantial changes to rectify inequality in funding decisions.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding SB54 is the extent of its enforcement mechanisms. The Civil Rights Department is given the authority to collect reports and charge fees for oversight within the structure created by the legislation. Critics question whether this approach will effectively lead to meaningful changes in investment practices or if it merely adds another layer of compliance without real consequence for failure to adhere. Ensuring that the collected data accurately reflects the realities of funding practices will be vital in demonstrating the bill’s success.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB164

State government.

CA AB164

State government.

CA AB131

Taxation.

CA SB116

Budget Act of 2017.

CA AB176

Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development: Office of Small Business Advocate: grant programs: taxation: credits: exclusions: sales and use tax.

CA SB176

Budget Act of 2022.

CA SB193

Economic development: grant programs and other financial assistance.

CA AB1817

State government.