California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB611

Introduced
2/15/23  
Introduced
2/15/23  
Refer
2/22/23  
Refer
2/22/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Refer
4/25/23  
Refer
4/25/23  
Report Pass
5/3/23  
Report Pass
5/3/23  
Engrossed
5/31/23  
Engrossed
5/31/23  
Refer
6/8/23  
Refer
6/10/24  
Refer
6/10/24  
Refer
6/27/24  
Refer
6/27/24  
Report Pass
7/2/24  
Report Pass
7/2/24  
Enrolled
8/28/24  
Enrolled
8/28/24  
Chaptered
9/19/24  
Chaptered
9/19/24  
Passed
9/19/24  

Caption

Residential rental properties: fees and security.

Impact

By establishing rules against certain fees, SB 611 aims to bolster tenant protections and enhance the rental experience for those in California. It reinforces the right of tenants to have a clear understanding of fees associated with their lease agreements and aims to prevent landlords from overstepping by imposing additional charges unrelated to actual costs incurred. The bill also includes stipulations regarding security deposits, ensuring limits on the amount a landlord can demand and requiring transparency when higher amounts are sought, especially from service members.

Summary

Senate Bill 611, introduced by Senator Menjivar, aims to amend various sections of the Civil Code concerning residential rental properties, specifically focusing on fees and security deposit regulations. Key provisions of the bill prohibit landlords or their agents from charging tenants fees for serving termination notices or for payment methods traditionally used in rent transactions (like checks). This legislation seeks to alleviate undue financial burdens on tenants from administrative costs that should not be passed on to them.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment around SB 611 has been positive among tenant advocacy groups who view it as a necessary step toward fairer treatment of renters. Advocates for landlords, however, express concern about the potential implications of these restrictions on their ability to manage properties effectively. The discussion often reflects a broader debate regarding tenant rights versus landlord responsibilities, which can lead to polarized views in legislative settings.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the interpretation of how far these regulations should extend and the balance of power between landlords and tenants. Some lawmakers argue that the limitations on fees could constrain landlords from performing necessary maintenance or administrative duties effectively. Critics also warn that strict regulations may inadvertently lead to higher rent prices as landlords adjust to maintain their profit margins in light of reduced fee income.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB414

Residential tenancies: return of security.

CA AB12

Tenancy: security deposits.

CA AB2801

Tenancy: security deposits.

CA SB644

Tenancy: security deposit: service members.