California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB616

Introduced
2/15/23  
Introduced
2/15/23  
Refer
2/22/23  
Refer
2/22/23  
Report Pass
4/20/23  
Report Pass
4/20/23  
Refer
4/24/23  
Refer
4/24/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Engrossed
5/31/23  
Engrossed
5/31/23  
Refer
6/15/23  
Refer
6/15/23  
Refer
6/19/23  
Refer
6/19/23  
Report Pass
6/29/23  
Report Pass
6/29/23  
Refer
6/29/23  
Refer
6/29/23  
Report Pass
9/1/23  
Report Pass
9/1/23  
Enrolled
9/13/23  
Enrolled
9/13/23  
Chaptered
10/4/23  
Chaptered
10/4/23  
Passed
10/4/23  

Caption

Sick days: paid sick days accrual and use.

Impact

The enactment of SB 616 is expected to have a significant impact on workers' rights in California, particularly in enhancing the protections for CBA employees and establishing uniform statewide regulations concerning sick leave. By requiring all employers to provide a minimum of 40 hours of paid sick leave that employees can use by the 200th calendar day of employment, the bill aims to provide a more consistent and equitable framework for sick leave across various sectors. Furthermore, the law encompasses a provision that prevents local ordinances from offering lesser sick leave benefits, thus ensuring that no locality can undermine the statewide standard.

Summary

Senate Bill 616, introduced by Gonzalez, aims to amend the Labor Code regarding paid sick days in California. Specifically, it extends rights and procedural requirements related to paid sick days to employees covered by collective bargaining agreements (CBA employees) and establishes new accrual rates and limitations on sick leave usage. The bill modifies existing requirements under the Healthy Workplaces, Healthy Families Act of 2014, and introduces provisions for railroad carrier employers and their employees, who are currently excluded under the existing law. As part of this amendment, SB 616 mandates that employees accumulate paid sick days at a rate of no less than one hour for every 30 hours worked and enhances the procedural protections against retaliation when employees utilize sick leave.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 616 appears to be largely favorable among labor advocates and worker representation groups, who view it as a step towards better employee rights and protections. However, there is also dissent from certain employer groups and lobbying organizations who argue that the expanded regulations may impose an additional burden on businesses, particularly smaller ones. This polarization highlights a broader debate about the balance between enhancing workers' rights and maintaining business flexibility.

Contention

One notable point of contention regarding SB 616 relates to its extension of sick leave rights to CBA employees and the stipulations concerning railroad carriers, which have generated discussion around the applicability of such regulations to various industries. Some stakeholders argue that the bill's alignment with statewide interests over local affairs diminishes local decision-making power regarding employee rights and welfare policies. The changes introduced by the bill could fundamentally reshape employer-employee dynamics surrounding sick leave, affecting how businesses approach their leave policies.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB555

Paid sick leave.

CA AB995

Paid sick days: accrual and use.

CA SB881

Paid sick days: accrual and use.

CA AB2841

Sick leave: accrual and use.

CA AB3216

Unemployment: rehiring and retention: state of emergency.

CA SB845

Safe and Affordable Drinking Water Fund.

CA AB1811

Human services omnibus.

CA AB84

Employment: COVID-19: supplemental paid sick leave.