Water Quality Control Plan: Delta Conveyance Project.
Impact
The bill's enactment would create a procedural requirement for the board, preventing the approval of operational changes to the Delta Conveyance Project until a thorough and updated water quality plan is in place. This requirement ensures that any potential diversions or changes to water rights are based on robust, up-to-date environmental studies, thereby potentially safeguarding water quality and aquatic ecosystems in the Delta region. By mandating this update before project changes can be addressed, SB 687 could significantly influence how and when water management strategies are implemented in the area.
Summary
Senate Bill 687, introduced by Senator Eggman, seeks to amend the Water Code in relation to water quality control, specifically concerning the Delta Conveyance Project. This bill mandates that the State Water Resources Control Board must adopt a final update of the 1995 Water Quality Control Plan related to the San Francisco Bay/Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Estuary prior to considering any changes in water rights permits or orders associated with the Delta Conveyance Project. The stipulation aims to ensure that any alterations to existing water management strategies uphold and reflect current water quality standards in light of ongoing ecological and environmental assessments.
Sentiment
Discussions around SB 687 appear to elicit a generally positive sentiment from environmental advocacy groups who support stricter oversight of water quality projects. These supporters contend that the bill represents a commitment to environmental protection and thoughtful resource management. Conversely, some stakeholders, particularly those associated with agricultural and water management interests, may view these additional regulatory requirements as hurdles to operational flexibility and economic efficiency.
Contention
Notable points of contention surrounding SB 687 include the concerns from industry stakeholders regarding potential delays in operational decisions that could stem from the need for updated plans and studies. Critics argue that these additional procedural steps could slow down necessary improvements and infrastructure projects aimed at improving water supply reliability. Furthermore, the bill explicitly states that it does not authorize funding for the Delta Conveyance Project nor create authority for building isolated conveyance facilities, which some opponents may argue limits the scope of solutions to address California’s water challenges.