California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB700

Introduced
2/16/23  
Introduced
2/16/23  
Refer
3/1/23  
Refer
3/1/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Report Pass
4/12/23  
Report Pass
4/12/23  
Refer
4/13/23  
Refer
4/13/23  
Report Pass
4/26/23  
Report Pass
4/26/23  
Refer
4/26/23  
Refer
4/26/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Engrossed
5/30/23  
Engrossed
5/30/23  
Refer
6/15/23  
Report Pass
6/29/23  
Report Pass
6/29/23  
Refer
6/29/23  
Refer
6/29/23  
Report Pass
7/6/23  
Refer
7/6/23  
Refer
7/6/23  
Report Pass
9/1/23  
Report Pass
9/1/23  
Enrolled
9/14/23  
Enrolled
9/14/23  
Chaptered
10/7/23  
Chaptered
10/7/23  
Passed
10/7/23  

Caption

Employment discrimination: cannabis use.

Impact

The bill's enactment signifies a shift in California's approach to employment and drug policy. It aims to align workplace policies with the evolving legal landscape regarding cannabis use, ensuring that individuals cannot be penalized in hiring, termination, or employment conditions solely based on lawful cannabis consumption. This reflects the broader trend toward more lenient cannabis regulations which could pave the way for similar laws in other states or jurisdictions, promoting employee rights and privacy.

Summary

Senate Bill 700, introduced by Senator Bradford, amends Section 12954 of the Government Code to address employment discrimination related to cannabis use. Effective January 1, 2024, the bill prohibits employers from discriminating against individuals based on their off-duty cannabis use and restricts employers from requesting information about applicants' past cannabis usage. This legislation aims to protect employees' rights concerning cannabis consumption outside of the workplace, reflecting a growing acceptance of cannabis use in society.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB 700 appears to be largely supportive, especially among advocates for employee rights and cannabis reform. Supporters commend the bill for reducing stigma associated with cannabis use and enhancing workers' rights. However, some skepticism exists regarding its implications for workplaces that maintain strict drug-free policies, with concerns raised about potential challenges in enforcing workplace safety standards.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the bill's exceptions regarding the construction trades and how it addresses past cannabis use as reflected in criminal history. Critics argue that while the bill protects off-duty usage, it does not fully remove the rights of employers to enforce drug testing in certain situations, such as federally regulated jobs. This indicates ongoing debates over how to balance individual rights with employer interests in maintaining safe and compliant workplaces.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1264

Employment discrimination: cannabis use.

CA AB2188

Discrimination in employment: use of cannabis.

CA AB1256

Employment discrimination: cannabis screening test.

OK HB1714

Employment of individuals who lawfully consume cannabis; protection; employment; effective date.

CA AB2355

Employment discrimination: medical cannabis.

HI SB377

Relating To Medical Cannabis.

HI HB238

Relating To Medical Cannabis.

HI HB238

Relating To Medical Cannabis.