California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB717

Introduced
2/16/23  
Introduced
2/16/23  
Refer
3/1/23  
Refer
3/1/23  
Report Pass
4/20/23  
Report Pass
4/20/23  
Refer
4/20/23  
Refer
4/20/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Engrossed
5/25/23  
Engrossed
5/25/23  
Refer
6/8/23  
Refer
7/5/23  
Refer
7/5/23  
Report Pass
7/12/23  
Report Pass
7/12/23  
Refer
7/12/23  
Refer
7/12/23  
Report Pass
9/1/23  
Enrolled
9/14/23  
Enrolled
9/14/23  
Chaptered
10/13/23  
Chaptered
10/13/23  
Passed
10/13/23  

Caption

County mental health services.

Impact

The statute adds a new section to the Welfare and Institutions Code, specifically Section 5623.6, which highlights the vulnerability of those found incompetent to stand trial. It aims to streamline the process by which these individuals are informed of their mental health needs and the available services. The bill represents a significant step towards improving mental health support and reducing the stigma surrounding mental illness within the legal system.

Summary

SB717, introduced by Senator Stern, addresses the growing need for mental health services for individuals found incompetent to stand trial in California. The bill mandates that if a court dismisses misdemeanor charges against a defendant due to their incompetence, the court must inform them of their ongoing need for mental health services. This provision ensures individuals are connected to essential resources designed to assist them after their legal proceedings, particularly for those who may not receive court-directed services post-dismissal.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB717 appears to be generally supportive, especially among advocates for mental health reform. Lawmakers and stakeholders who emphasize the importance of mental health care view this bill as a proactive measure to help at-risk populations. Nevertheless, discussions may arise regarding the implementation and resource allocation for these mandated services, as funding and accessibility can be contentious issues in discussions about healthcare reform.

Contention

While the bill is largely viewed as beneficial, there is potential for contention in how effectively local jurisdictions can deliver the required services outlined in the bill. Critics may voice concerns regarding the adequacy of state and county resources to fulfill these obligations and whether this additional responsibility might overwhelm existing systems. This aligns with broader discussions about the intersection of mental health policy and the criminal justice system, highlighting ongoing debates about the most effective approaches to care for mentally ill individuals within the legal framework.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB3077

Criminal procedure: borderline personality disorder.

CA SB1400

Criminal procedure: competence to stand trial.

CA AB1564

Master of Divinity: physician and surgeon: title.

CA AB2547

Criminal procedure: competence to stand trial.

CA AB935

Juvenile proceedings: competency.

VA SB1405

Evaluation and determination of competency; raising question of competency to stand trial or plead.

CA AB1584

Criminal procedure: competence to stand trial.

CA AB2405

Intensive behavioral health treatment facilities.