Self-generation incentive program.
The bill mandates that 70% of the funding appropriated by the Legislature for the self-generation incentive program be allocated to incentives for low-income residential customers who install behind-the-meter solar photovoltaic systems paired with energy storage systems. This approach is intended to increase participation among vulnerable populations, including low-income renters and rural households with inadequate electricity infrastructure. Furthermore, it advocates for technological guidelines and block grant structures to facilitate community-based engagement and access to these resources.
Senate Bill 851, introduced by Senator Stern, seeks to amend the existing self-generation incentive program under Section 379.10 of the Public Utilities Code. This bill aims to enhance the deployment of distributed generation resources and energy storage systems to improve grid reliability and resiliency. By requiring the California Public Utilities Commission to establish a more equitable incentive structure, SB 851 focuses on broadening access for eligible residential customers, especially targeting low-income households, who have historically been underrepresented in these programs.
The sentiment regarding SB 851 appears to be largely positive, with supporters emphasizing its potential to enhance energy equity and accessibility. Advocates argue that by creating a more inclusive framework, the bill could significantly uplift low-income households, enabling them to benefit from renewable energy technologies. However, there may be concerns regarding the implementation of these new guidelines and whether they can adequately overcome the existing barriers that limit participation.
One notable point of contention revolves around how effectively the bill can create pathways for previously excluded populations. Critics might argue that while the intentions are noble, the complexity of existing program designs may undermine the bill's objectives unless substantial changes are made. Additionally, the bill notes that there will be no reimbursement required for local agencies, which may raise questions about fiscal impacts on local government entities and their willingness to support the program.